yeh the flecks and hairs are from the scanner, i dusted it off, but forgot about the back light...
i probably should wipe that off as well before i scan anymore.. lol
was really noticeable in the next lot i put through...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/villephant ... 6072859447
(the ones in that set from that point on (clicking next) are ones i scanned the other night)
it was the main reason i wanted to scan them myself, i had a roll scanned for me from that camera last time and i wasn't entirely happy with it, they came back in bits. there are supposed to be 4 frames per shot, but they gave me 2 or 3 and sometimes they were cut in half... which made it difficult to work with (although some of them i tried to play with that lol)
but yeh the dust and hairs are really obvious >.<
nah sometimes stuff on the scanner adds to the photo. i used to not like the look, but it can add to it which is kind of cool.