kicks/sneakers/trainers/runners
nubeRob M wrote:All nikes, past and present look shit. Jordans are shit. It's all shit. I've owned a few nikes, they last like what, 3 months...wow, good workmanship on those. took all but 30c to make any of those. but you're paying $200+ on research&dev....ooooh shox! i'm impressed. /sarcasm.ADD_Boy wrote:Agreed.breaksRbest wrote: yeah, I agree. But ALL Nikes look horrid?
That's just stupid
I've got a pair of Mizuno runners, fitted to my foot shape and walk style and they've lasted 3 years so far, with extensive abuse.
If you buy shoes on the merit of style and looks, i don't care. It's your cash, and i'm of the opinion you get what you pay for. I've had a shocking run with Nikes and will never buy them ever. Haven't since '99 anyway. My point is, they still look as bad as they are made.
You can't polish a turd!
ive had three pairs of these in this colourway, havent even chewed through one pair properly and ive had them four years, hence buying some more (with "abuse" whatever your definition of that is, rubbing it on ur footstool or something.
recently got another colourway also, theyre the best shoes made besides jordan IVs (which i have never seen wear through or fall apart) and CD Rick Howard 01s, which were so good i bought two pairs of also, and between them they lasted like 7 years (still going, too)
[/2cents]
Last edited by Spherix on Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
lowercase//Immerse//Tube10//BareDubs//Sub Continental Dub//On The Edge//Camino Blue
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E
lol you all know i'm right. nikes are poorly made. prove me wrong then and show me a pair you've got that isn't either dirty as fook, soles worn, holes, grips gone from the bottom, airs popped, etc. etc.
ankle breakin' pieces of shit.
and i agree with mecka, the classic style just is terrible. sense of style comes from being original, not nostalgic. you just look like a dweebling nerd ready for a fad beating.
i'm suprised none of you bigup salmon polo's at the same time. because that's how lame i see these nike shoes as being.
ankle breakin' pieces of shit.
and i agree with mecka, the classic style just is terrible. sense of style comes from being original, not nostalgic. you just look like a dweebling nerd ready for a fad beating.
i'm suprised none of you bigup salmon polo's at the same time. because that's how lame i see these nike shoes as being.
- Lós Kasino—
- Posts: 3721
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 2:04 am
- Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Rob M wrote:you just look like a dweebling nerd
RICH
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rob_marko/48012035/
lowercase//Immerse//Tube10//BareDubs//Sub Continental Dub//On The Edge//Camino Blue
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E
Rob M wrote:prove me wrong then and show me a pair you've got that isn't either dirty as fook, soles worn, holes, grips gone from the bottom, airs popped, etc. etc.
show you A pair, just one??
I could show you at least 5 that I've had for over 3 years and wear all the time.
ppffft
go drink some Haterade
I think I am, Therefore I am. I think
- ADD_Boy
- like a tiger
- Posts: 8087
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:57 pm
- Location: Where the wild things are / Burn
http://www.skinsite.com/info_tinea_pedis.htm wrote:You should change your shoes everyday. Alternate 2-3 pairs of shoes, so the shoes will dry out completely before you use them again.
PUCK YOU MISS ~~!
Mate how much do u think those shoes u just brought cost to make? Not having a dig but its all about personal preffernce innit?Rob M wrote:woot, I just got my first pair of ebay bought shoes, and they fit perfect!!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... 5465524721
so happy right now
yep thats true, judging how my mates wear them in and how much abuse they can take -- they were a good buy.
and also i have very limited options of shoes at size 14. so nobody needs to trip on my choices.
fyi, if you urinate in shower on your feet, you won't get tinea. look it up. i'm not saying i do it religiously, but that said i've never had tinea in my life; and i shower daily. So if tinea is a problem for you, maybe you need to analyse what you're not cleaning.
and also i have very limited options of shoes at size 14. so nobody needs to trip on my choices.
fyi, if you urinate in shower on your feet, you won't get tinea. look it up. i'm not saying i do it religiously, but that said i've never had tinea in my life; and i shower daily. So if tinea is a problem for you, maybe you need to analyse what you're not cleaning.
Last edited by Rob M on Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
not really trolling, just personal preferences mate.. and decent shoe size availability limits.
No need to pretend you've never heard about it. if so, then you learn something new everyday. More power to youADD_Boy wrote:Niiiiiiiiiiiice!!Rob M wrote:fyi, if you urinate in shower on your feet, you won't get tinea. look it up.
- ADD_Boy
- like a tiger
- Posts: 8087
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:57 pm
- Location: Where the wild things are / Burn
Not pretending bro. Just think thats a bit wrong pissing on your feet.. Piss goes in toilet.Rob M wrote:not really trolling, just personal preferences mate.. and decent shoe size availability limits.
No need to pretend you've never heard about it. if so, then you learn something new everyday. More power to youADD_Boy wrote:Niiiiiiiiiiiice!!Rob M wrote:fyi, if you urinate in shower on your feet, you won't get tinea. look it up.
PUCK YOU MISS ~~!
lol don't bring in the seinfeld argument into the debate
next thing you'll tell me, you never had sex in a shower. where does all the ***** go then?
double standards.
for the record, I doubt piss could be doing anymore damage than the chemicals in soap mixed in with the filth on your body. clean your shower often?
next thing you'll tell me, you never had sex in a shower. where does all the ***** go then?
double standards.
for the record, I doubt piss could be doing anymore damage than the chemicals in soap mixed in with the filth on your body. clean your shower often?
- witty_pseudonym
- Posts: 11779
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:53 am
- Location: betwixt and between
if nobody tried to counter my logic (to try and look impressive themselves), none of this would have ever happend.witty_pseudonym wrote:on mb.c it's often best not to question i reckon.dust wrote:
You guys are all strange.
How on earth did a conversation about shoes, turn into one about the properties of wee and why one should wee on ones own feet.
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E
- witty_pseudonym
- Posts: 11779
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:53 am
- Location: betwixt and between
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E
quick wrote:Diesel shoes = Salmon Polo
my excuse is that they were the only size 14s I could find among shops open relatively late on a friday night in portland. they've spited me ever since, mainly by having one of the buttons pop off. pos.
even nike town had like five pairs across the whole store. serious disappointment.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E
- breaksRbest
- Posts: 9966
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
- Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E