Fruity Loops, your opinion wanted please
Fruity Loops, your opinion wanted please
A friend of mine has given me a copy of Fruity loops and swears by it, i used Fruity like 6 or 7 years ago and i remember it being quite limited, however, my mate has the latest (or close to) version and i had a brief play around the other day and it looks the goods, but i just have this mental tarnish on the name from my past experience. What are its limitations if any?
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
I know someone who makes excellent music in FL
and its not to exxy either
and right, from all accounts if you arent using a tracker, its the business for drums
and its not to exxy either
and right, from all accounts if you arent using a tracker, its the business for drums
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
nutri grain.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
Hey Almax... how's things?? I've been using FL for about 10 years. Theres not really any limitations that I've found, but of course, it depends what you want from it. FL is perfect for what I'm doing (pattern-based programming). I've also used it to record live guitars and percussion on top of programmed loops, and it worked fine.
The only problems I have with FL are:
- not available for OSX
- doesn't currently utilize the dual core on my laptop
- not really suitable for live/jam use (but thats where Ableton comes in)
The only problems I have with FL are:
- not available for OSX
- doesn't currently utilize the dual core on my laptop
- not really suitable for live/jam use (but thats where Ableton comes in)
nice work dude, yeh the latests versions have really transformed it into a respectable and complete production tool.
it all depends in which way you prefer to sequence your songs. Its all about the plugins and samples to give your song your own touch.
I find fruity great for getting your ideas down really quickly and trying loads of different sequences.
theres plenty of big name producers like Spor, Skream etc.. and they all swear by using it.
have fun!
it all depends in which way you prefer to sequence your songs. Its all about the plugins and samples to give your song your own touch.
I find fruity great for getting your ideas down really quickly and trying loads of different sequences.
theres plenty of big name producers like Spor, Skream etc.. and they all swear by using it.
have fun!
- paranoid edge
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:03 pm
- Location: Da Cray
- Contact:
- db
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 3:02 pm
- Location: Just left the house in my blue allstars
- Contact:
Fuck you too cock boy!! I DO answer my phone these days.almax wrote:hmmm, yeah i have an MPC for drums so prolly wouldn't need it for that alone. And no its not db, he would have to answer his phone to be able to give me anything so fuck that khunt
Word, nuff said.paranoid edge wrote: Fruity or STFU
Actually a little more...
Both Wasp and i have been using Fruitys for creation for over 7 years now and still we haven't found anything close to it.
Fair nuff it's not pro tools or cubase but untill you are mixing down to final recording, it is all you will ever need.
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
i use different software for their strengths.
i've used fruity on and off since version 2
FL Studio 7 has limitations, but everything does.
if i was going for new software i'd go for a tracker
10 things i like about FL Studio 7
1. the slicer.
great for mashing drums, but also nifty for melodic samples, even blines if you're feeling adventurous
2. the mixer
the routing is awesome, really quick and efficient sidechaning and grouping
3. patterns
i love working in patterns, you don't need to keep muting stuff, you can work on a break or synth line or sample or whatever as 16 bars and add it to the sequencer
4. the new playlist editor
it has the old pattern sequencer, but i never use it anymore, now you get a visual representation of midi data, automation clips and audio clips
5. the piano roll
quick straightforward sequencing. the chop and quantise features are well implemented, plus having editable velocity, pitch, cutoff and resonance for each hit makes drum choppage a dream
6. the make unique function
in the playlist editor you can click on the arrow on the side of an audio track, automation clip or pattern and make it unique, eg pattern 22 clones and becomes pattern 22 and 23 letting you have a loop rolling, but make slight edits to each pattern ... quickly
7. the effects
the parametric eq is low cpu and really effective
the multiband compressor is adequate and low on the CPU
8. the automation
you can automate everything, every parameter of a vst, the velocity, the mixer routing, the tempo
9. the time stretching
good tempo detection algorithm. fast time stretching. usually sounds good.
10. the package
this program does heaps for the money, they give you updates and support if you need it
10 things i don't like about FL7
1. the lack of a freeze function
i would love it if you could freeze a channel to audio so that VSTs didn't always have to be running
2. when time stretching sounds shit
this happens if you try and stretch melodic stuff too much, too grainy and warbley
3. no undo on timestretching
seriously what the fuck?
4. short undo history
why?
5. the sample editor
the edison is a vast improvement, but could be developed a lot
6. the limitation of the pattern based approach
it does affect the creative process in good and bad ways, the new playlist editor is offering more flexibility
7. rendering
could be a few more options in the choice of outs. i'd like to be able to render just certain mixer channels (remember to always set your settings to the highest mixer interpolation for rendering)
8. the new features project and tutorials
could be more in depth and less tacky
9. not being able to add automation for vsts etc into the piano roll
would be nice to be able to automate stuff under the notes that are playing
10. other users
the amount of shit producers that use it, and don't use its features in a challenging way give it a rep for sounding crap and being limited
hope that helps in some way
i've used fruity on and off since version 2
FL Studio 7 has limitations, but everything does.
if i was going for new software i'd go for a tracker
10 things i like about FL Studio 7
1. the slicer.
great for mashing drums, but also nifty for melodic samples, even blines if you're feeling adventurous
2. the mixer
the routing is awesome, really quick and efficient sidechaning and grouping
3. patterns
i love working in patterns, you don't need to keep muting stuff, you can work on a break or synth line or sample or whatever as 16 bars and add it to the sequencer
4. the new playlist editor
it has the old pattern sequencer, but i never use it anymore, now you get a visual representation of midi data, automation clips and audio clips
5. the piano roll
quick straightforward sequencing. the chop and quantise features are well implemented, plus having editable velocity, pitch, cutoff and resonance for each hit makes drum choppage a dream
6. the make unique function
in the playlist editor you can click on the arrow on the side of an audio track, automation clip or pattern and make it unique, eg pattern 22 clones and becomes pattern 22 and 23 letting you have a loop rolling, but make slight edits to each pattern ... quickly
7. the effects
the parametric eq is low cpu and really effective
the multiband compressor is adequate and low on the CPU
8. the automation
you can automate everything, every parameter of a vst, the velocity, the mixer routing, the tempo
9. the time stretching
good tempo detection algorithm. fast time stretching. usually sounds good.
10. the package
this program does heaps for the money, they give you updates and support if you need it
10 things i don't like about FL7
1. the lack of a freeze function
i would love it if you could freeze a channel to audio so that VSTs didn't always have to be running
2. when time stretching sounds shit
this happens if you try and stretch melodic stuff too much, too grainy and warbley
3. no undo on timestretching
seriously what the fuck?
4. short undo history
why?
5. the sample editor
the edison is a vast improvement, but could be developed a lot
6. the limitation of the pattern based approach
it does affect the creative process in good and bad ways, the new playlist editor is offering more flexibility
7. rendering
could be a few more options in the choice of outs. i'd like to be able to render just certain mixer channels (remember to always set your settings to the highest mixer interpolation for rendering)
8. the new features project and tutorials
could be more in depth and less tacky
9. not being able to add automation for vsts etc into the piano roll
would be nice to be able to automate stuff under the notes that are playing
10. other users
the amount of shit producers that use it, and don't use its features in a challenging way give it a rep for sounding crap and being limited
hope that helps in some way
- SoulWhiteMan
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:03 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
spot on!nic wrote:its like $210 and u get lifetime upgrades
great for price and heaps of support if you pay.
although my mum paid for it on her credit card for my birthday a few years back, it says "hello anna" in the help section!
also
many pros out there use fruity as a writer, and cubase as a sequencer/mixer
James Holden is one of them!
Ha ha, bait taken, reel him in Spiesy, but make sure you catch and release, dont forget to give 'im a big rex hunt kiss toosAme'0 wrote:Direktor wrote:Who are they?sAme'0 wrote:skream and spor use fruty loops nuff said
skream is probably the biggest dubstep producer
and spor makes the most evil chopy d'n'b
cliff would be disapointed that u dont know who he is
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
could be the best defense of any software i ever read. thanks konk.konk wrote:Once its on vinyl no1 knows the difference. Sure some lame arse audio geek who knows the characteristics of the time stretch algorithms. But in the end its the creative integrity your work holds. What ever flows your note
- db
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 3:02 pm
- Location: Just left the house in my blue allstars
- Contact:
word.unsoundbwoy wrote:could be the best defense of any software i ever read. thanks konk.konk wrote:Once its on vinyl no1 knows the difference. Sure some lame arse audio geek who knows the characteristics of the time stretch algorithms. But in the end its the creative integrity your work holds. What ever flows your note
It's not just about how something sounds. It's what you can do with it that's equally as important.konk wrote:Once its on vinyl no1 knows the difference. Sure some lame arse audio geek who knows the characteristics of the time stretch algorithms. But in the end its the creative integrity your work holds. What ever flows your note
You could have the cleanest sounding audio engine in the world - but if it takes you 5 days to write a decent beat, well... I just hope you're a patient person.
(PS: Not saying Fruity's is time-consuming, far from it - just making a point).
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
It's not time...
I'm talking more about the power of the program, and how intuitive the interface is.
Sure you'd be stoked if you wrote a good song, no longer how much time it took - but programs that take forever to accomplish simple tasks are a pain in the ass. I like to be able to quickly transpose what's in my head onto the program before I forget it...
I'm talking more about the power of the program, and how intuitive the interface is.
Sure you'd be stoked if you wrote a good song, no longer how much time it took - but programs that take forever to accomplish simple tasks are a pain in the ass. I like to be able to quickly transpose what's in my head onto the program before I forget it...
Last edited by Direkt on Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
true enoughDirektor wrote:It's not time...
I'm talking more about the power of the program, and how intuitive the interface is.
Sure you'd be stoked if you wrote a good song, no longer how much time it took - but programs that take forever to accomplice simple tasks are a pain in the ass. I like to be able to quickly transpose what's in my head onto the program before I forget it...
Skream uses FL? nice
http://www.soundcloud.com/grooki
Poised above the void on a cloud of dreams, Everything I grasp is sand through my hands
Poised above the void on a cloud of dreams, Everything I grasp is sand through my hands
those website photos always look so damn good! Big screen and hi res
http://www.soundcloud.com/grooki
Poised above the void on a cloud of dreams, Everything I grasp is sand through my hands
Poised above the void on a cloud of dreams, Everything I grasp is sand through my hands
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am