Monitors
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
although i understand the rationale i dont really subscribe to it for all cases. ive been around audio gear long enough to know when im making an acceptable compromise. and really given the amount of time i have for my sound work and my other financial prorities i cant justify the extra $$ unfortunately.a1studmuffin wrote:My advice - save up and get the better ones. It may seem expensive, but it's a one-off cost and settling for second best will affect everything you work on, and you'll want to upgrade after awhile. I simply found my old 5" Alesis monitors inadequate. My 8" HR824s are exactly what I was after - I can't see myself upgrading - EVER - unless I break them!
its not like im looking at the cheapest anyway. i dont want to get pokey 5" $600p boxes, the rolands look like something that next level up without the $2000 madness - but so little online reviews... must be new?
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- a1studmuffin
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:59 pm
FS - yeah fair enough mate, just get the best that you can afford. Whatever your budget is, I'd consider trying to get second-hand monitors that are a notch up (ex-display models or second-hand from ebay/trading post) rather than brand new ones that don't rate as highly. I was lucky enough to grab my HR824s from Derringers in Adelaide. They were ex-displays as the HR824s were superceded by the HR824 MKII. Ended up getting about $1000 off in total, so was pretty pleased!
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
Seems to be the case everywhere... hmmmDirektor wrote:I haven't heard anything about Roland monitors, good or bad.
you know of other monitors at that price/size point?
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
yeah, think ill skip the m-audios, the 8" are comparable price but not quality IMO. Need to listen to the KRKs, theres also some yamahas too.
I still feel 5"s dont have enough, and at that price point 8"s tend to be overblown but maybe thats an incorrect assumption. it does help me to narrow down what im looking for though!
I still feel 5"s dont have enough, and at that price point 8"s tend to be overblown but maybe thats an incorrect assumption. it does help me to narrow down what im looking for though!
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
had another listen today passing past allans, but need to bring in some bassier music. i like them, good mids seperation. compared them to the m-1s which sounded mipressive but potentially overblown in the bass- which i was told they have a reputation for...
will put together some dub and jungle to relisten, along with some breakcore and soundart stuff for the tops
will put together some dub and jungle to relisten, along with some breakcore and soundart stuff for the tops
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
i know the dyns a better though always loved dyns, working in high end hifi spoiled me!
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
too ugly too. couldn't live with
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
might pop by that store sometime too. they had a few monitors last i checked
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
Back from a listening session at alans. some thoughts (cant remember model numbers, but all speakers around $700-1200.
KRK's (8"?): best all rounder and $12/1300 retail. good bass extension and no major compromises. ugly as sin though
Roland DM7 (6.5"). Very good mids, highs, excellent seperation, tansient response. realistic bass but not much extension. no sense of physical presence in that regard but doesnt do anything it cant handle. The 8" was a real step up but more expensive - quite gentieel speakers
Alesis M1 680s: Didn't like. fake, fatiguing bass and when playing music where the bass wandered it showed although strong, was more of a one note wonder in the bottom end.
Yamahas (8"?): Nice bass but didn't like the upper mid balance. seemed skewiff and fatiguing
Berhinger 8": actually not bad sounding, but for the size of box etc the bass was really a bit of a trick - sounded well balanced but really had no extension when asked
M-audio 8": not good
Events were ok but sounded boxy, fatiguing. vibrated too
compared to the 8" mackies ($2-2300) of course they all sounded wak. actually the roland stood up well in the mids/tops but the overall presence, with bass, of the makies was WOW
Might make a trip to factory next. the krks seem like a good refernce point for an affordable speaker. pity about the looks!
KRK's (8"?): best all rounder and $12/1300 retail. good bass extension and no major compromises. ugly as sin though
Roland DM7 (6.5"). Very good mids, highs, excellent seperation, tansient response. realistic bass but not much extension. no sense of physical presence in that regard but doesnt do anything it cant handle. The 8" was a real step up but more expensive - quite gentieel speakers
Alesis M1 680s: Didn't like. fake, fatiguing bass and when playing music where the bass wandered it showed although strong, was more of a one note wonder in the bottom end.
Yamahas (8"?): Nice bass but didn't like the upper mid balance. seemed skewiff and fatiguing
Berhinger 8": actually not bad sounding, but for the size of box etc the bass was really a bit of a trick - sounded well balanced but really had no extension when asked
M-audio 8": not good
Events were ok but sounded boxy, fatiguing. vibrated too
compared to the 8" mackies ($2-2300) of course they all sounded wak. actually the roland stood up well in the mids/tops but the overall presence, with bass, of the makies was WOW
Might make a trip to factory next. the krks seem like a good refernce point for an affordable speaker. pity about the looks!
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
if you wanna talk aesthetics the Mackies are the shittest looking speakers I've seen for some time.
I didn't really like the look of the dyns at all untill I got them home and realised how badass the little black metal tweater guards and the grey plates they sit in looked.
got nothing on big fuck of fluro yellow speaker cones though, hah.
I didn't really like the look of the dyns at all untill I got them home and realised how badass the little black metal tweater guards and the grey plates they sit in looked.
got nothing on big fuck of fluro yellow speaker cones though, hah.
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
yeah i certainly wouldnt say they amazed me in any way but felt that for the price all the compromises were evened out - nothing shocking in any freq range, but nothing amazing either.
other speakers seemed to strongly overdo or miss something for that price range
just curious, if you thought they were rubbish was this in comparison to more $$ speakers, or others around that point?
other speakers seemed to strongly overdo or miss something for that price range
just curious, if you thought they were rubbish was this in comparison to more $$ speakers, or others around that point?
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
ive been in love with the slotty woofer design on the dyns since i was a wee tacker!flippo wrote:if you wanna talk aesthetics the Mackies are the shittest looking speakers I've seen for some time.
I didn't really like the look of the dyns at all untill I got them home and realised how badass the little black metal tweater guards and the grey plates they sit in looked.
got nothing on big fuck of fluro yellow speaker cones though, hah.
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
Partly my own stuipd fault for starting of listening to shit that was mroe expensive. but If I put a limit on myself, I would have easily gone the event TR series over the KRK's if I was getting cheaper ones. They were a bit hyped though, but yeah I felt the midrange was passing through a paper bag on the KRK'sFoundationStepper wrote: just curious, if you thought they were rubbish was this in comparison to more $$ speakers, or others around that point?
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
understand what your saying. they certiainly didn't have the clarity of say the rolands, but were adequate for the price i thought
there are some new mackies out id like to hear, the MR5" and 8"s, $800 and $1400 retail respectively
there are some new mackies out id like to hear, the MR5" and 8"s, $800 and $1400 retail respectively
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
not allans, factory or awave from what i see
soundcorp has the other ribbon ones, the adams
soundcorp has the other ribbon ones, the adams
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
Maybe try Arck for Samson's... 9489 8822
They're located at:
WH1, 650A Nicholson St, Fitzroy North
I just rang Mark there, and they definately have stock.
Any stores that don't have stock should still be able to quote your prices and order stock in within a day as we have plenty of stock here (at the wholesalers).
They're located at:
WH1, 650A Nicholson St, Fitzroy North
I just rang Mark there, and they definately have stock.
Any stores that don't have stock should still be able to quote your prices and order stock in within a day as we have plenty of stock here (at the wholesalers).
PS: Samson's won't have overly strong bass representation for those with big studios (and if this is the case, just fork out a few extra dollars for the added sub). Id say they are a good all-round monitor - with good detail, especially for their price point.
They beat everything in the their class in the Future Music review.
I'd also recommend only getting the Samson Rubicon 5A's or 6A's, as the 8A's tend to have a boomy bass.
They beat everything in the their class in the Future Music review.
I'd also recommend only getting the Samson Rubicon 5A's or 6A's, as the 8A's tend to have a boomy bass.
- a1studmuffin
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:59 pm
Talking monitor aesthetics is like discussing the furniture at a porn shoot.flippo wrote:if you wanna talk aesthetics the Mackies are the shittest looking speakers I've seen for some time.
I didn't really like the look of the dyns at all untill I got them home and realised how badass the little black metal tweater guards and the grey plates they sit in looked.
got nothing on big fuck of fluro yellow speaker cones though, hah.
was tongue in cheeka1studmuffin wrote:Talking monitor aesthetics is like discussing the furniture at a porn shoot.flippo wrote:if you wanna talk aesthetics the Mackies are the shittest looking speakers I've seen for some time.
I didn't really like the look of the dyns at all untill I got them home and realised how badass the little black metal tweater guards and the grey plates they sit in looked.
got nothing on big fuck of fluro yellow speaker cones though, hah.
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
went to hitek today, compared the new mackie mr5, mr8, with the tapco equivs and the krk 6"s. and the proper mackies for a point of reference
in summary:
while i previously said (and stick my it) the krks seem like a reasonble all rounder for the price (not great but evenly compormised) the mackies killed them in detail, imaging and tranient response. krks are so dead and matted together sound in comparison. the mrs are very good value fo this end of the market
the mr5 is screwy (pretty sure the eq setting was even, i hope so). it was the same as the alesis 680 - didn't really go low (and cant be expected to) but overcompensated by a forceful upper bass (120-160 Hz). when it needed to drop lower did the one note thing again. the bass "sounded" louder on the 5s than the 8s which is not a good thing
the mr8s are ace. they are well balanced, good detail/imaging. amazing value. fucking massive though. i really like them! was wanting a little more detail in the very tops but a more than acceptable compromise for the price ($1400 rrp a pair)
the tapcos sound like absolute shite, cant belive they are even a released product.
and of course the hrs are just great, but very difficult to justify the massive price jump!
in summary:
while i previously said (and stick my it) the krks seem like a reasonble all rounder for the price (not great but evenly compormised) the mackies killed them in detail, imaging and tranient response. krks are so dead and matted together sound in comparison. the mrs are very good value fo this end of the market
the mr5 is screwy (pretty sure the eq setting was even, i hope so). it was the same as the alesis 680 - didn't really go low (and cant be expected to) but overcompensated by a forceful upper bass (120-160 Hz). when it needed to drop lower did the one note thing again. the bass "sounded" louder on the 5s than the 8s which is not a good thing
the mr8s are ace. they are well balanced, good detail/imaging. amazing value. fucking massive though. i really like them! was wanting a little more detail in the very tops but a more than acceptable compromise for the price ($1400 rrp a pair)
the tapcos sound like absolute shite, cant belive they are even a released product.
and of course the hrs are just great, but very difficult to justify the massive price jump!
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
gotta get something to make noise on yet...
anyway mot making tunes, making installation work
anyway mot making tunes, making installation work
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
Ha! Good to see someone else who hates the Tapco's!
I've got a few mates (who's opinions I usually respect) who love 'em... but I reckon that they're beyond flat (if that makes sense) - everything sounds bland and same, same. I think they were the S8's I heard???
Don't Mackie make Tapco? I thought they were Mackie's cheap alternative.
I've got a few mates (who's opinions I usually respect) who love 'em... but I reckon that they're beyond flat (if that makes sense) - everything sounds bland and same, same. I think they were the S8's I heard???
Don't Mackie make Tapco? I thought they were Mackie's cheap alternative.
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
Yes they do. i dont think they will sell any tapcos now these cheaper makies are out
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
sitting here at home with a nice pair of m8s looking at me...
got em from soundcorp. good listening setup there
got em from soundcorp. good listening setup there
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
- Lós Kasino—
- Posts: 3721
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 2:04 am
- Location: Brooklyn, NYC
anyone heard the focals? they are nothing short from amazing really. )
after months of searching for the right high end monitor.. these were the ones.
if u guys havnt head them drop into awave some time to have a listen, even next to adams they sound sonically superior...check out what everyone on gear slutz has to say bout them vs the adams (see links below)
what makes them nicer is they are no way near as colored as those adam ribbon tweeters., the crossover curves in them are the cleanest ive heard.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/good-new ... twin6.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/high-end ... l-sm8.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much- ... am-a7.html
after months of searching for the right high end monitor.. these were the ones.
if u guys havnt head them drop into awave some time to have a listen, even next to adams they sound sonically superior...check out what everyone on gear slutz has to say bout them vs the adams (see links below)
what makes them nicer is they are no way near as colored as those adam ribbon tweeters., the crossover curves in them are the cleanest ive heard.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/good-new ... twin6.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/high-end ... l-sm8.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much- ... am-a7.html