Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

This is the forum for all things Melbourne beats. Post your gigs and other Melbourne music related information here. Keep it about the music and music only, please keep on topic.
Post Reply
User avatar
DEGENERATI0N
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm

Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by DEGENERATI0N »

Im sure this topic has probably already been done on MBC but not anytime by me and I am amazed that there are so many people out there who still require things to be explained properly.


True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.

True: Compressing WAV to mp3 loses quality although 320kbps is virtually impossible to tell apart from WAV

False: All digital formatted music sounds like shit.


A: There is a whole set of deterioration factors involved with vinyl that range from needle quality, condition of the record, wiring connections, vibration, dust, counterweight settings and the list goes on.

B: The music is transferred from digital to vinyl in the first place so playing it on that format in full post mastered quality is essentially the music in its purest form, the thing people seem to have trouble understanding is the quality only gets lost when compressing it or switching platforms.


There is a big difference between being an crusty mp3 DJ and playing music direct from the artists studio or the mastering house.
Its definitely a concern that serato is being bastardized by the idiots who are out there flexing blatantly pirated music and clouding the real purpose and benefits of having all this awesome technology.

There are loads of djs using digital platforms to play brand new top quality stuff from themselves and and other producer buddies so provided you are playing full quality wave files or 320kbps mp3's there is no noticable sound diffrence between real vinyl and digital at all.
Image
User avatar
nic
Posts: 11184
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by nic »

well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.

since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
Last edited by nic on Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by fooishbar »

DEGENERATI0N wrote:There is a big difference between being an crusty mp3 DJ and playing music direct from the artists studio or the mastering house.
mastered tunes sound better than unmastered tunes. if you're playing unmastered 320s, they're not going to sound half as good as mastered dubs (or even just mastered wavs/320s), especially on a system, and especially when you're talking about tunes with serious sub weight. end of.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by deviant »

O ordered $150 worth of shit from beatport a few weeks ago....... because the order was so large I opted not to do the WAV thing due to cost......

TOTALLY regret it now :(

320s sound weak weak weak
User avatar
DEGENERATI0N
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by DEGENERATI0N »

nic wrote: blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.

yea thats what i thought too.
Image
User avatar
DEGENERATI0N
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by DEGENERATI0N »

deviant wrote:O ordered $150 worth of shit from beatport a few weeks ago....... because the order was so large I opted not to do the WAV thing due to cost......

TOTALLY regret it now :(
I agree ive got some pretty crap bits from them aswell.
beatport is notoriously unreliable for file quality but that doesnt really stand against the sound of a 320 from logic or something like that.
Image
User avatar
spin
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by spin »

DEGENERATI0N wrote:
nic wrote: blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.

call up mosus and get out the chiesel, this is some of your finest work... you should turn it into a cave painting while your bush.
ANYTHING:TEST
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by same o »

Image
User avatar
spin
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by spin »

i play all sorts of files when im out and about, i think with digital we are teething and once these teenage mp3's are out of the game we can grow some sub sonic testicles and live up to the dream that is vinyl...
ANYTHING:TEST
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Stray
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:21 pm
Location: in and out and round about

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by Stray »

nic wrote:well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.

since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
lolz

bla blllaaaaooooowww!!
User avatar
nic
Posts: 11184
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by nic »

moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by fooishbar »

nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
haha word, plus most of the ninja tune dubstep releases sound better on chemical 64kb samples than vinyl.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
User avatar
unsoundbwoy
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by unsoundbwoy »

nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
scripticles x 10000000000

priority

1. decent mixdown
2. decent mastering
3. decent format
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by deviant »

DUDE!!! you forgot number 1 priority!!! let me provide a revised version for you


1. awesome tune
2. decent mixdown
3. decent mastering
4. decent format

;)
User avatar
FoundationStepper
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by FoundationStepper »

DEGENERATI0N wrote:True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
its a largely academic point when most systems are either high-passed or not massive enough to do anything justice under 30Hz
Scholtzy
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 4:37 pm
Location: 3206

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by Scholtzy »

FoundationStepper wrote:
DEGENERATI0N wrote:True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
its a largely academic point when most systems are either high-passed or not massive enough to do anything justice under 30Hz
But CD format goes down to 20hz. From a production perspective you don't need to go lower otherwise your just moving air / eating up headroom.

You miss out on a fair bit of high end too with vinyl, CD's have a way flatter frequency response. If you listen out for things like tambourines and hats they come through on CD better.

The source these days is most likely to be digital. Its not like vinyl creates frequencies that aren't there,...the reality is that the conversion process removes frequencies.

I agree about a well mastered release on vinyl sounding better than a half arsed digital master tho.
User avatar
FoundationStepper
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by FoundationStepper »

in my understanding, the resonant frequency of a tt arm (at least on 1200's) is around 15Hz. Its concievable that this, or harmonics of this, are what contribute to the supposed "warmth" of the bass sound in the sub 50Hz range. That and the general noise from physical pickup process

but, yes, it is largely just moving air
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by deviant »

agree on the high-end issue....

CDs do tend to sound way clearer..... especially if the decks/needles etc are crappy or un-serviced, which they most often are in club-land.
User avatar
Direkt
Posts: 15205
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:38 am
Location: The Voir
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by Direkt »

nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
Ken oath.

Got some Digital Soundboy stuff that was squashed to the fuck.

Gaydome.
User avatar
ctoafn_DMZ
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 11:16 pm
Location: Collateral Damage in yo' face ;-)
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by ctoafn_DMZ »

Since I moved to CDJ's, I'm enjoying DJ'ing so much more.

As long as you are using 320 mp3s, 99% of punter wont tell the difference and as for 1%, they are probably just DJ chinstrokers sitting up the back anaylsing it too much when they should be dancing ;-)

I pretty much only use beatport for all my tunes and out of the 2 thousands or so I've bought, only 2 have been rubbish.
User avatar
Smile on Impact
Posts: 1001
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: Collingwood
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by Smile on Impact »

Direkt wrote:
nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
Ken oath.

Got some Digital Soundboy stuff that was squashed to the fuck.

Gaydome.
Same. and what's worse is when it's a good track, but it's so fuckin squished you don't want to play it. I can't stand the over compressed flatline subbass. It means the tracks have zero bounce. It's a major gripe of mine.
User avatar
mrj
Posts: 13377
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:07 am
Location: the Penski file

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by mrj »

a1studmuffin wrote:Image
:scr1pt:

must we go over this again. again. again.
He's climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up.
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by same o »

yes we must, this is the internets
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by JAMESSSS »

At least with Vinyl you really need to get it mastered at a house for vinyl still.

With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.

"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
Don't hate me for house
User avatar
tee193
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:01 pm
Location: sandringham

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by tee193 »

donnie darko is better than requim for a dream.
dubstep is not as good as drum and bass
bill cosby or garey busey
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by fooishbar »

jbs wrote:At least with Vinyl you really need to get it mastered at a house for vinyl still.

With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.

"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
seen.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by deviant »

tee193 wrote:donnie darko is better than requim for a dream.
:scr1pt:
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by JAMESSSS »

RUDI PON THE MIXDOWN
Don't hate me for house
User avatar
Flash
Posts: 762
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:21 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by Flash »

Image
ruuudiiiiiiiii
User avatar
obliveus
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Ringwood North
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by obliveus »

Bring back pause tapes, I say. They sound the best. Always got my parties rockin back in Grade 6. Def Leopard into Ramones into Sex Pistols into Weird Al Yankovic. It was pure bliss.

:smt003

Ya'll got way better ears than I do, but the only thing I've noticed is that Serato DJ's (not CD) tend to get louder. I'm extremely mindful of this when I play and I'm always walking out in front of the decks to check the sound levels (unfortunately, quality doesn't factor in to this brain of mine). I tend to turn the bass up just a bit and the high down just a bit, as well. It's my way of "trying" to recreate my beloved vinyl warmth, though I doubt anyone notices...and I have no idea if this actually works, but someone told me once that I should do it with digital. Tell me if I'm mistaken.

I reckon all the guys I know now who play CD's are so fricken good with their CDJ 1000's that I cant even compare them to my experiences, i.e...

Vinyl = High School
CD = PhD's
Serato = Tradesmen

Regardless of sound, I love digital now. I'm officially converted. Not for the sound, but for the ease of buying tunes and transporting gear to, between and from gigs.

:my2cents:
User avatar
DEGENERATI0N
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by DEGENERATI0N »

jbs wrote:
With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.

"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
I guess that probably happens a lot out there, that might explain some of the dreadfully loud clounstep going around these days.
pends on who you know i spose.
Image
User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 4379
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: bracken
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by youthful_implants »

deviant wrote:DUDE!!! you forgot number 1 priority!!! let me provide a revised version for you


1. awesome tune
2. decent mixdown
3. decent mastering
4. decent format

;)
Yeah this is true tunes don't NEED to be mastered to play out they just need to be mixed well with some headroom to turn them up. I have had tunes sent back from one of the industry's most respected engineer where he's blatanty just whacked it through the L2 and I sent it back. Lazy tbh LOL

People who love vinyl mistake a limited frequency range for warmth which is easier to reproduce digitally in fact. S'why you are hearing more and more tracks with sampled crackles and analogue glitches in them it reassures the purists.
Strontium Music

Image

SOUNDCLOUD | FACEBOOK | TWITTER | TUMBLR
User avatar
spin
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by spin »

obliveus wrote:Bring back pause tapes, I say. They sound the best. Always got my parties rockin back in Grade 6. Def Leopard into Ramones into Sex Pistols into Weird Al Yankovic. It was pure bliss.

:smt003

Ya'll got way better ears than I do, but the only thing I've noticed is that Serato DJ's (not CD) tend to get louder. I'm extremely mindful of this when I play and I'm always walking out in front of the decks to check the sound levels (unfortunately, quality doesn't factor in to this brain of mine). I tend to turn the bass up just a bit and the high down just a bit, as well. It's my way of "trying" to recreate my beloved vinyl warmth, though I doubt anyone notices...and I have no idea if this actually works, but someone told me once that I should do it with digital. Tell me if I'm mistaken.

I reckon all the guys I know now who play CD's are so fricken good with their CDJ 1000's that I cant even compare them to my experiences, i.e...

Vinyl = High School
CD = PhD's
Serato = Tradesmen

Regardless of sound, I love digital now. I'm officially converted. Not for the sound, but for the ease of buying tunes and transporting gear to, between and from gigs.

:my2cents:
i hear that.
ANYTHING:TEST
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by fooishbar »

nic wrote:well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.

since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
hahahaah, what?
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
Expert Knob Twiddler
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:09 pm

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by Expert Knob Twiddler »

nic wrote:well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.
.
he-he-he...... yep!!
tactik
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound

Post by tactik »

True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
Incorrect.
Vinyl's dynamic range is smaller than CD's...
They sound different because they have to be mastered differently.
ie; for vinyl- everything below about 200-300Hz has to be mono and they roll off the high end about 17-18kHz.
Many of us enjoy the sound of vinyl, I don't know exactly why that is... It could be the way the RCA curve effects the audio. The way the mastering engineer tweaked the sound. The way the vinyl-crackle and hiss creates a very satisfying high-frequency sound (make a fat beat.. then chuck some vinyl-crackle over it.. oh yeah) Or even the way the stereo information is transcribed into a single groove that might also have an effect that our brains can notice/use.

As for digital vs record DJing.

I don't know... For me, there is a difference in skill. But not all that much.
Obviously, this autoBPM-autoMixing-"timestretch your songs at correct BPM" shit I've seen some cats do for their entire preplanned sets, is ballsack.
But if you are the kind of DJ that uses the extra time and freedom this stuff gives you.. then it's all good.
Post Reply