Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
- DEGENERATI0N
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm
Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Im sure this topic has probably already been done on MBC but not anytime by me and I am amazed that there are so many people out there who still require things to be explained properly.
True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
True: Compressing WAV to mp3 loses quality although 320kbps is virtually impossible to tell apart from WAV
False: All digital formatted music sounds like shit.
A: There is a whole set of deterioration factors involved with vinyl that range from needle quality, condition of the record, wiring connections, vibration, dust, counterweight settings and the list goes on.
B: The music is transferred from digital to vinyl in the first place so playing it on that format in full post mastered quality is essentially the music in its purest form, the thing people seem to have trouble understanding is the quality only gets lost when compressing it or switching platforms.
There is a big difference between being an crusty mp3 DJ and playing music direct from the artists studio or the mastering house.
Its definitely a concern that serato is being bastardized by the idiots who are out there flexing blatantly pirated music and clouding the real purpose and benefits of having all this awesome technology.
There are loads of djs using digital platforms to play brand new top quality stuff from themselves and and other producer buddies so provided you are playing full quality wave files or 320kbps mp3's there is no noticable sound diffrence between real vinyl and digital at all.
True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
True: Compressing WAV to mp3 loses quality although 320kbps is virtually impossible to tell apart from WAV
False: All digital formatted music sounds like shit.
A: There is a whole set of deterioration factors involved with vinyl that range from needle quality, condition of the record, wiring connections, vibration, dust, counterweight settings and the list goes on.
B: The music is transferred from digital to vinyl in the first place so playing it on that format in full post mastered quality is essentially the music in its purest form, the thing people seem to have trouble understanding is the quality only gets lost when compressing it or switching platforms.
There is a big difference between being an crusty mp3 DJ and playing music direct from the artists studio or the mastering house.
Its definitely a concern that serato is being bastardized by the idiots who are out there flexing blatantly pirated music and clouding the real purpose and benefits of having all this awesome technology.
There are loads of djs using digital platforms to play brand new top quality stuff from themselves and and other producer buddies so provided you are playing full quality wave files or 320kbps mp3's there is no noticable sound diffrence between real vinyl and digital at all.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.
since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
Last edited by nic on Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
mastered tunes sound better than unmastered tunes. if you're playing unmastered 320s, they're not going to sound half as good as mastered dubs (or even just mastered wavs/320s), especially on a system, and especially when you're talking about tunes with serious sub weight. end of.DEGENERATI0N wrote:There is a big difference between being an crusty mp3 DJ and playing music direct from the artists studio or the mastering house.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
O ordered $150 worth of shit from beatport a few weeks ago....... because the order was so large I opted not to do the WAV thing due to cost......
TOTALLY regret it now
320s sound weak weak weak
TOTALLY regret it now
320s sound weak weak weak
- DEGENERATI0N
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
nic wrote: blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
yea thats what i thought too.
- DEGENERATI0N
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
I agree ive got some pretty crap bits from them aswell.deviant wrote:O ordered $150 worth of shit from beatport a few weeks ago....... because the order was so large I opted not to do the WAV thing due to cost......
TOTALLY regret it now
beatport is notoriously unreliable for file quality but that doesnt really stand against the sound of a 320 from logic or something like that.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
DEGENERATI0N wrote:nic wrote: blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
call up mosus and get out the chiesel, this is some of your finest work... you should turn it into a cave painting while your bush.
ANYTHING:TEST
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
i play all sorts of files when im out and about, i think with digital we are teething and once these teenage mp3's are out of the game we can grow some sub sonic testicles and live up to the dream that is vinyl...
ANYTHING:TEST
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
lolznic wrote:well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.
since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
bla blllaaaaooooowww!!
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
haha word, plus most of the ninja tune dubstep releases sound better on chemical 64kb samples than vinyl.nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
scripticles x 10000000000nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
priority
1. decent mixdown
2. decent mastering
3. decent format
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
DUDE!!! you forgot number 1 priority!!! let me provide a revised version for you
1. awesome tune
2. decent mixdown
3. decent mastering
4. decent format
1. awesome tune
2. decent mixdown
3. decent mastering
4. decent format
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
its a largely academic point when most systems are either high-passed or not massive enough to do anything justice under 30HzDEGENERATI0N wrote:True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
But CD format goes down to 20hz. From a production perspective you don't need to go lower otherwise your just moving air / eating up headroom.FoundationStepper wrote:its a largely academic point when most systems are either high-passed or not massive enough to do anything justice under 30HzDEGENERATI0N wrote:True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
You miss out on a fair bit of high end too with vinyl, CD's have a way flatter frequency response. If you listen out for things like tambourines and hats they come through on CD better.
The source these days is most likely to be digital. Its not like vinyl creates frequencies that aren't there,...the reality is that the conversion process removes frequencies.
I agree about a well mastered release on vinyl sounding better than a half arsed digital master tho.
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
in my understanding, the resonant frequency of a tt arm (at least on 1200's) is around 15Hz. Its concievable that this, or harmonics of this, are what contribute to the supposed "warmth" of the bass sound in the sub 50Hz range. That and the general noise from physical pickup process
but, yes, it is largely just moving air
but, yes, it is largely just moving air
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
agree on the high-end issue....
CDs do tend to sound way clearer..... especially if the decks/needles etc are crappy or un-serviced, which they most often are in club-land.
CDs do tend to sound way clearer..... especially if the decks/needles etc are crappy or un-serviced, which they most often are in club-land.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Ken oath.nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
Got some Digital Soundboy stuff that was squashed to the fuck.
Gaydome.
- ctoafn_DMZ
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 11:16 pm
- Location: Collateral Damage in yo' face ;-)
- Contact:
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Since I moved to CDJ's, I'm enjoying DJ'ing so much more.
As long as you are using 320 mp3s, 99% of punter wont tell the difference and as for 1%, they are probably just DJ chinstrokers sitting up the back anaylsing it too much when they should be dancing
I pretty much only use beatport for all my tunes and out of the 2 thousands or so I've bought, only 2 have been rubbish.
As long as you are using 320 mp3s, 99% of punter wont tell the difference and as for 1%, they are probably just DJ chinstrokers sitting up the back anaylsing it too much when they should be dancing
I pretty much only use beatport for all my tunes and out of the 2 thousands or so I've bought, only 2 have been rubbish.
- a1studmuffin
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:59 pm
- Smile on Impact
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:14 pm
- Location: Collingwood
- Contact:
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Same. and what's worse is when it's a good track, but it's so fuckin squished you don't want to play it. I can't stand the over compressed flatline subbass. It means the tracks have zero bounce. It's a major gripe of mine.Direkt wrote:Ken oath.nic wrote:moar about teh mastering job than teh format i reckon
iv bought some shcoking wavs from online shops, totally fucking smashed limited so hard its like a magnum icecream with a little handle at teh beginning and a massive black block pon the end
Got some Digital Soundboy stuff that was squashed to the fuck.
Gaydome.
http://www.myspace.com/smileonimpact
Check out "Wisdom Teeth"
https://www.beatport.com/en-US/html/con ... sdom_teeth
Check out "Wisdom Teeth"
https://www.beatport.com/en-US/html/con ... sdom_teeth
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
a1studmuffin wrote:
must we go over this again. again. again.
He's climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
yes we must, this is the internets
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
At least with Vinyl you really need to get it mastered at a house for vinyl still.
With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.
"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.
"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
Don't hate me for house
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
donnie darko is better than requim for a dream.
dubstep is not as good as drum and bass
bill cosby or garey busey
dubstep is not as good as drum and bass
bill cosby or garey busey
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
seen.jbs wrote:At least with Vinyl you really need to get it mastered at a house for vinyl still.
With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.
"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
tee193 wrote:donnie darko is better than requim for a dream.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
RUDI PON THE MIXDOWN
Don't hate me for house
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
ruuudiiiiiiiii
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Bring back pause tapes, I say. They sound the best. Always got my parties rockin back in Grade 6. Def Leopard into Ramones into Sex Pistols into Weird Al Yankovic. It was pure bliss.
Ya'll got way better ears than I do, but the only thing I've noticed is that Serato DJ's (not CD) tend to get louder. I'm extremely mindful of this when I play and I'm always walking out in front of the decks to check the sound levels (unfortunately, quality doesn't factor in to this brain of mine). I tend to turn the bass up just a bit and the high down just a bit, as well. It's my way of "trying" to recreate my beloved vinyl warmth, though I doubt anyone notices...and I have no idea if this actually works, but someone told me once that I should do it with digital. Tell me if I'm mistaken.
I reckon all the guys I know now who play CD's are so fricken good with their CDJ 1000's that I cant even compare them to my experiences, i.e...
Vinyl = High School
CD = PhD's
Serato = Tradesmen
Regardless of sound, I love digital now. I'm officially converted. Not for the sound, but for the ease of buying tunes and transporting gear to, between and from gigs.
:my2cents:
Ya'll got way better ears than I do, but the only thing I've noticed is that Serato DJ's (not CD) tend to get louder. I'm extremely mindful of this when I play and I'm always walking out in front of the decks to check the sound levels (unfortunately, quality doesn't factor in to this brain of mine). I tend to turn the bass up just a bit and the high down just a bit, as well. It's my way of "trying" to recreate my beloved vinyl warmth, though I doubt anyone notices...and I have no idea if this actually works, but someone told me once that I should do it with digital. Tell me if I'm mistaken.
I reckon all the guys I know now who play CD's are so fricken good with their CDJ 1000's that I cant even compare them to my experiences, i.e...
Vinyl = High School
CD = PhD's
Serato = Tradesmen
Regardless of sound, I love digital now. I'm officially converted. Not for the sound, but for the ease of buying tunes and transporting gear to, between and from gigs.
:my2cents:
- DEGENERATI0N
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
I guess that probably happens a lot out there, that might explain some of the dreadfully loud clounstep going around these days.jbs wrote:
With digital I suspect the lure of giving it to your man Rudi who just completed an audio engineering online course and should have his diploma in the mail real soon for the mixdown and master is all too strong.
"Hey Rudi, let's make it louder, seen?"
pends on who you know i spose.
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 4379
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: bracken
- Contact:
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Yeah this is true tunes don't NEED to be mastered to play out they just need to be mixed well with some headroom to turn them up. I have had tunes sent back from one of the industry's most respected engineer where he's blatanty just whacked it through the L2 and I sent it back. Lazy tbh LOLdeviant wrote:DUDE!!! you forgot number 1 priority!!! let me provide a revised version for you
1. awesome tune
2. decent mixdown
3. decent mastering
4. decent format
People who love vinyl mistake a limited frequency range for warmth which is easier to reproduce digitally in fact. S'why you are hearing more and more tracks with sampled crackles and analogue glitches in them it reassures the purists.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
i hear that.obliveus wrote:Bring back pause tapes, I say. They sound the best. Always got my parties rockin back in Grade 6. Def Leopard into Ramones into Sex Pistols into Weird Al Yankovic. It was pure bliss.
Ya'll got way better ears than I do, but the only thing I've noticed is that Serato DJ's (not CD) tend to get louder. I'm extremely mindful of this when I play and I'm always walking out in front of the decks to check the sound levels (unfortunately, quality doesn't factor in to this brain of mine). I tend to turn the bass up just a bit and the high down just a bit, as well. It's my way of "trying" to recreate my beloved vinyl warmth, though I doubt anyone notices...and I have no idea if this actually works, but someone told me once that I should do it with digital. Tell me if I'm mistaken.
I reckon all the guys I know now who play CD's are so fricken good with their CDJ 1000's that I cant even compare them to my experiences, i.e...
Vinyl = High School
CD = PhD's
Serato = Tradesmen
Regardless of sound, I love digital now. I'm officially converted. Not for the sound, but for the ease of buying tunes and transporting gear to, between and from gigs.
:my2cents:
ANYTHING:TEST
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
BOB DEEP
WOBBLE
REVOLVER
BLACK CAT
http://gutterhype.blogspot.com/
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
hahahaah, what?nic wrote:well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.
since vinyl left teh scene djing got alot more fun. digital is great because it allows you to play ANYTHING ANYTIME brand new second hand it doesn't matter, hit up my mans blogs at lunch - blasting bassssslines that night. All fresh mind you, most of the stuff I play you wouldn't of heard before ya know? blaaaaooooww just like that i rock my cammo pants and a black hoodie, i aint no goodie goodie, russian bare dubs i collect mashing sets you wont forget bbbllllaaaaooooowwww bbbooooyyyyyyeeeeee. party girls in fluro underwear u best seen done watch out, stroking batty mans dem drum and bass snout, pon de toilet cubicles i hear a shout, there is no rescue degeneration, mammals dun count. blllaaaoooowwww. yyeeeeaaahhhh.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
-
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:09 pm
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
he-he-he...... yep!!nic wrote:well sometimes I bang 128kpbs in the club / bar, no one can tell (unless you have seen seen seen sound). I have bare girls dancing all over, iv got the laptop so i done need to pay attention hardly to the mix, all about the selection. just blaow blaow click click pass me another drink, im set.
.
Re: Digital dj'ing does not necessarily mean inferior sound
Incorrect.True: Vinyl does sound better than CD due to the limitations of the frequency range.
Vinyl's dynamic range is smaller than CD's...
They sound different because they have to be mastered differently.
ie; for vinyl- everything below about 200-300Hz has to be mono and they roll off the high end about 17-18kHz.
Many of us enjoy the sound of vinyl, I don't know exactly why that is... It could be the way the RCA curve effects the audio. The way the mastering engineer tweaked the sound. The way the vinyl-crackle and hiss creates a very satisfying high-frequency sound (make a fat beat.. then chuck some vinyl-crackle over it.. oh yeah) Or even the way the stereo information is transcribed into a single groove that might also have an effect that our brains can notice/use.
As for digital vs record DJing.
I don't know... For me, there is a difference in skill. But not all that much.
Obviously, this autoBPM-autoMixing-"timestretch your songs at correct BPM" shit I've seen some cats do for their entire preplanned sets, is ballsack.
But if you are the kind of DJ that uses the extra time and freedom this stuff gives you.. then it's all good.