media influence

For all your off topic conversation requirements. No posts about gigs please, use the Music forum. As usual, no "NSFW" material, keep it clean.
Post Reply
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

media influence

Post by same o »

hey as most of u know i am still at high school, i am doing media, and doing alot on media influence, ie. how the media influence's people.
i would like to just hear what peoples thoughts on censorship is, if they think that things like video games like manhunt promote or influence people to kill and all that sort of stuff..
thanks
User avatar
lynt
Posts: 16011
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:14 pm
Contact:

Post by lynt »

Manhunt is wicked... though I did put the controller down after I slowly cut a dudes head off... but I came back.

Shotguns are rad.
DBoy
Posts: 11265
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am

Post by DBoy »

on the weekend me and ADD boy went out and stole a car. After about two blocks we decided that we didn't like it and saw a better car, so we dumped the first one and jumped into a corvette. Nice as. We rammed about 3 police cars, ran over 10 pedestrians and robbed a bank.
We got caught twice, but got let off. We also died once or twice, but it doesn't matter, cause dieing is not really real, you like, just start back at my house again and it's all sweet.

I got some interesting Essays I did on this kinda of thing Pete, during my Sociology of the Mass Media subject, but bit hard to discuss here in short.
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

DBoy wrote:.
I got some interesting Essays I did on this kinda of thing Pete, during my Sociology of the Mass Media subject, but bit hard to discuss here in short.
if u could send em to me that would be really good i am really interested in this sort of stuff... atm we are basicly looking at communication models and theories...
i am just sort of wondering what peoples reaction to things like ken park being banned are.. if people have seen it do they think it should be banned..
User avatar
mrj
Posts: 13377
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:07 am
Location: the Penski file

Post by mrj »

DBoy wrote:on the weekend me and ADD boy went out and stole a car. After about two blocks we decided that we didn't like it and saw a better car, so we dumped the first one and jumped into a corvette. Nice as. We rammed about 3 police cars, ran over 10 pedestrians and robbed a bank.
We got caught twice, but got let off. We also died once or twice, but it doesn't matter, cause dieing is not really real, you like, just start back at my house again and it's all sweet.

I got some interesting Essays I did on this kinda of thing Pete, during my Sociology of the Mass Media subject, but bit hard to discuss here in short.
lol.

environment + heredity = personality = behaviour

media is a part of environment, and more and more is present in ways that dont really consciously register. we are constantly barraged from every angle by multiple forms of media.

as for censorship, I hate to say it but it is at least partially required, although I believe some things are over censored, whilst others under censored.
Last edited by mrj on Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
He's climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up.
User avatar
Riz-One
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:07 am
Location: at the bar

Post by Riz-One »

yo, i did this topic in year 12.. from what i can remember there were a few articles about little girls turning into pshyco's after watching scream movies and dudes becoming neo nazi's from watching snuff films etc.

It's all about your personal life and other social factors like your mental health and living conditions, friends and family etc that really influence people to do certain things. media may cause some influence but its not something you can place a blame on.

It depends on what theories you believe in and how media affects people. there a few different ones as im sure you would know but the only ones that really back up this are things like the bullet theory, where people can't think for themselves and they absorb information like a sponge, but this was proved to be a load of shit. So.... yeah, I can watch someone get killed and not want to do it, sometimes its good to be desensitized from an early age, sometimes its not.

if u want more shit lemme know i can pick my brain some more.
User avatar
aspekt
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: me!bourne

Post by aspekt »

the thing that really gets me worked up are these conservative religious nuts who have so much issue with nudity. Do these people shower in the dark with their eyes closed or something?

I think things like over censorship is typical of a society where nobody is willing to take responsibility for their actions or those of their children. I play something like GTA and have huge amounts of fun stealing cars and sniping people. I get off the computer and have no desire to do that in real life. If i did there would be something fundamentally wrong with my views and perceptions of the world.
There's no justice, just us.
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

crinklez wrote:yo, i did this topic in year 12.. from what i can remember there were a few articles about little girls turning into pshyco's after watching scream movies and dudes becoming neo nazi's from watching snuff films etc.

It's all about your personal life and other social factors like your mental health and living conditions, friends and family etc that really influence people to do certain things. media may cause some influence but its not something you can place a blame on.

It depends on what theories you believe in and how media affects people. there a few different ones as im sure you would know but the only ones that really back up this are things like the bullet theory, where people can't think for themselves and they absorb information like a sponge, but this was proved to be a load of shit. So.... yeah, I can watch someone get killed and not want to do it, sometimes its good to be desensitized from an early age, sometimes its not.

if u want more shit lemme know i can pick my brain some more.
yeah brain picking would be good man.. i'll give u a call soon have a mix and do sum brain picking..
i personally dont belive ny of the theories in the sense that i think that they all apply they are all wrong and all right because it all depends on the person.. this thread was basicly to see how people think that the media effects them and other people around them..
thanks for the feedback so far..
User avatar
Fents
Posts: 9551
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:32 am
Location: In the Brewery.
Contact:

Post by Fents »

Can someone do my homework for me too? :lol:
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

Fents wrote:Can someone do my homework for me too? :lol:
shhhhhhhhhh... nah i am good boy.. i just was interested to see what other people think so that i could perhaps factor it in, in my essays.. i personally disagree with censorship and the way people use games such as gta as a scapegoat.. however i was interested to see if people had different views to myne, and if they did i could factor it into my essays..
User avatar
shepherd
Posts: 2836
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:13 am
Location: Tehran
Contact:

Re: media influence

Post by shepherd »

sAme'0 wrote:hey as most of u know i am still at high school, i am doing media, and doing alot on media influence, ie. how the media influence's people.
i would like to just hear what peoples thoughts on censorship is, if they think that things like video games like manhunt promote or influence people to kill and all that sort of stuff..
thanks
How is a computer game 'media'? Do you want to explore how the media influence people via opinion ... or whether there's a connection between simulated violence and real violence?
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Re: media influence

Post by same o »

shepherd wrote:
sAme'0 wrote:hey as most of u know i am still at high school, i am doing media, and doing alot on media influence, ie. how the media influence's people.
i would like to just hear what peoples thoughts on censorship is, if they think that things like video games like manhunt promote or influence people to kill and all that sort of stuff..
thanks
How is a computer game 'media'? Do you want to explore how the media influence people via opinion ... or whether there's a connection between simulated violence and real violence?
computer games are concidered a media form.. according to mi teacher and my text book. it is considered an interactive form of media.
DBoy
Posts: 11265
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am

Post by DBoy »

defintions change for media, especailly in theoretical discourse.

media
:A surrounding environment in which something functions and thrives.
:The substance or medium in which a specific organism lives and thrives.
:A culture medium.
:forms of communication
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

DBoy wrote:defintions change for media, especailly in theoretical discourse.

media
:A surrounding environment in which something functions and thrives.
:The substance or medium in which a specific organism lives and thrives.
:A culture medium.
:forms of communication
thank you d boy
User avatar
mrj
Posts: 13377
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:07 am
Location: the Penski file

Post by mrj »

aspekt wrote:the thing that really gets me worked up are these conservative religious nuts who have so much issue with nudity. Do these people shower in the dark with their eyes closed or something?

I think things like over censorship is typical of a society where nobody is willing to take responsibility for their actions or those of their children. I play something like GTA and have huge amounts of fun stealing cars and sniping people. I get off the computer and have no desire to do that in real life. If i did there would be something fundamentally wrong with my views and perceptions of the world.
thats not the point. a great majority of the population (at least the adult population) is able to seperate reality from fiction and make educated and rational decisions and form their own beliefs and morals via self analysis.

censorship is aimed at controlling the sense data recieved by a portion of the population from whom this is not true. some people (be they either too young or mentally ill) can not do this, as they dont have the emotional and intellectual maturity neccesary.

censorship is neccesary, but as always it comes with the need for eternal vigilance.
He's climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up.
User avatar
shepherd
Posts: 2836
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:13 am
Location: Tehran
Contact:

Post by shepherd »

DBoy wrote:defintions change for media, especailly in theoretical discourse.

media
:A surrounding environment in which something functions and thrives.
:The substance or medium in which a specific organism lives and thrives.
:A culture medium.
:forms of communication
That's a pretty broad definition - but I haven't studied media so don't really know the formalities.

Reason I asked is Same'o used the comment 'how THE media influences people' as opposed to how one form of 'media' may contribute to actions outside of that environment.

I don't envy you same'o ... that's a massive topic and one you could explore forever!
User avatar
Lós Kasino—
Posts: 3721
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 2:04 am
Location: Brooklyn, NYC

Post by Lós Kasino— »

have you studied the Bo-Bo doll experiment by Albert Bandura regarding imitation behaviour and the influence of tv ???

worth a mention !
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

mrj wrote:
aspekt wrote:the thing that really gets me worked up are these conservative religious nuts who have so much issue with nudity. Do these people shower in the dark with their eyes closed or something?

I think things like over censorship is typical of a society where nobody is willing to take responsibility for their actions or those of their children. I play something like GTA and have huge amounts of fun stealing cars and sniping people. I get off the computer and have no desire to do that in real life. If i did there would be something fundamentally wrong with my views and perceptions of the world.
thats not the point. a great majority of the population (at least the adult population) is able to seperate reality from fiction and make educated and rational decisions and form their own beliefs and morals via self analysis.

censorship is aimed at controlling the sense data recieved by a portion of the population from whom this is not true. some people (be they either too young or mentally ill) can not do this, as they dont have the emotional and intellectual maturity neccesary.

censorship is neccesary, but as always it comes with the need for eternal vigilance.
i agree with u to an extent, however i think that the society that we live in, is quite well, over censored.. it is getting better.. however how can people censor the film ken park, i personally didnt think that it was porn and i thought that it was a good movie that did look into a darker world that teenagers apparently do live in... ny ways nuff of what i think what does everyone else think.. need some more opinions..
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

T I C K A wrote:have you studied the Bo-Bo doll experiment by Albert Bandura regarding imitation behaviour and the influence of tv ???

worth a mention !
yep i have
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

shepherd wrote:
DBoy wrote:defintions change for media, especailly in theoretical discourse.

media
:A surrounding environment in which something functions and thrives.
:The substance or medium in which a specific organism lives and thrives.
:A culture medium.
:forms of communication
That's a pretty broad definition - but I haven't studied media so don't really know the formalities.

Reason I asked is Same'o used the comment 'how THE media influences people' as opposed to how one form of 'media' may contribute to actions outside of that environment.

I don't envy you same'o ... that's a massive topic and one you could explore forever!
it is a massive topic, however because most of us have pre concieved topics before we get to them it is often quite easy to right an argumentative essay.. however what i am trying to do is get all points that one could have and then try and write so that the reader can decide from there what they belive.
DBoy
Posts: 11265
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am

Post by DBoy »

shepherd wrote:
DBoy wrote:defintions change for media, especailly in theoretical discourse.

media
:A surrounding environment in which something functions and thrives.
:The substance or medium in which a specific organism lives and thrives.
:A culture medium.
:forms of communication
That's a pretty broad definition - but I haven't studied media so don't really know the formalities.

Reason I asked is Same'o used the comment 'how THE media influences people' as opposed to how one form of 'media' may contribute to actions outside of that environment.

I don't envy you same'o ... that's a massive topic and one you could explore forever!
very broad, you have to think about it in context to "mediums' rather than the more obvious perception of "media" like TV, radio and print.

It seems PeteyB that you are most interested in the side of the topic that is shaped be censorship of any medium that is made available to the public? and why it is censored and how the content may effect the consumer or viewer of said product?

Really just diverges into a discussion of deviance and what is generally accepted by society, and what lies in the grey areas. Where does content in a fiction situation border on offending the sensabilities of the public based on what behaviour is accpeted in reality.

Then you have the difference between what is accepted by classing it as art compared to entertainment, or simulation. ehh. uni flashbacks.
DBoy
Posts: 11265
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am

Post by DBoy »

sAme'0 wrote:however what i am trying to do is get all points that one could have and then try and write so that the reader can decide from there what they belive.
how very post modern of you.
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

DBoy wrote:
shepherd wrote:
DBoy wrote:defintions change for media, especailly in theoretical discourse.

media
:A surrounding environment in which something functions and thrives.
:The substance or medium in which a specific organism lives and thrives.
:A culture medium.
:forms of communication
That's a pretty broad definition - but I haven't studied media so don't really know the formalities.

Reason I asked is Same'o used the comment 'how THE media influences people' as opposed to how one form of 'media' may contribute to actions outside of that environment.

I don't envy you same'o ... that's a massive topic and one you could explore forever!
very broad, you have to think about it in context to "mediums' rather than the more obvious perception of "media" like TV, radio and print.

It seems PeteyB that you are most interested in the side of the topic that is shaped be censorship of any medium that is made available to the public? and why it is censored and how the content may effect the consumer or viewer of said product?

Really just diverges into a discussion of deviance and what is generally accepted by society, and what lies in the grey areas. Where does content in a fiction situation border on offending the sensabilities of the public based on what behaviour is accpeted in reality.

Then you have the difference between what is accepted by classing it as art compared to entertainment, or simulation. ehh. uni flashbacks.
i got flash backs from nam, or maybe it was acid and i thought i was in nam.. meh
sAme'0 wrote:
however what i am trying to do is get all points that one could have and then try and write so that the reader can decide from there what they belive.


how very post modern of you.
lol.. y thank u..
User avatar
Riz-One
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:07 am
Location: at the bar

Post by Riz-One »

haha i remeber the bo bo doll's.. those studies were proved to be insufficient

there were heaps of studies, hardly any of them are of any relevance.

like that one were they made one group of kids watch non violent material and the other group of kids watch the violent stuff

the kids who watched the non-violent stuff became violent because they werent allowed to watch the violent stuff. :roll:
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

alot of studdies done arnt or cant be accurate because they are totaly different enviroments to what they are normally in. the only way to real study human behaviour is to basicly do a truman show where the subject does not realise that they are being watched, however even then it is not quite right because, all the people were actors, the only way u could do it would be to watch the human race from space and watch human behaviour with out them knowing..
RMHC
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:54 pm

Post by RMHC »

if you get a chance Samo the picture search video store on swan st in richmond has a dodgy copy of Ken Park (its pretty full on, but beautifully shot) you just kinda have to ask for it like your buying drugs
User avatar
Riz-One
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:07 am
Location: at the bar

Post by Riz-One »

you seem like you know whats going on with this shit, are you aiming for extremly high acedemic results?

i studied a bit and got decent marks im sure you can swing it, unless yeh u aiming high for some uni course or something?
User avatar
Direkt
Posts: 15205
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:38 am
Location: The Voir
Contact:

Post by Direkt »

Pete, perhaps you could talk about the propaganda of Nazi Germany... they brainswashed almost a whole society through the media and other means.
Also, we studied early Australian school texts at uni - these books were on the Government syllabus and they called aborigines 'savages' and said that they 'ate their young' and all sorts of bullshit. It's no wonder certain people are now racists after having their brains polluted and corrupted at such an early age...
Last edited by Direkt on Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DBoy
Posts: 11265
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am

Post by DBoy »

I did my major in particpant observation. (anthro, no soc.) Did a exercise into the behavior of people at 2 melbourne clubs. Spent something like 70 hours in two clubs in the same spot each week (5 hours at a time), just watching and making notes etc.
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

tiggus85 wrote:if you get a chance Samo the picture search video store on swan st in richmond has a dodgy copy of Ken Park (its pretty full on, but beautifully shot) you just kinda have to ask for it like your buying drugs
i have seen it and it is one of mi all time favourite movies..
crinklez wrote:you seem like you know whats going on with this shit, are you aiming for extremly high acedemic results?

i studied a bit and got decent marks im sure you can swing it, unless yeh u aiming high for some uni course or something?
yeah i am aiming for high marks... studying like a bitch been going since 8:30 this mornin.. plan to go till 5:00..
Direktor wrote:Pete, perhaps you could talk about the propaganda of Nazi Germany... they brainswashed almost a whole society through the media and other means.
Also, we studied early Australian school texts at uni - these books were on the Government syllabus and they called aborigines 'savages' and said that they 'ate their young' and all sorts of bullshit. It's no wonder certain people are now racists after having the brains polluted at such an early age...
yeah we have looked at nazi propagander however i think that it is harder look at things from the past because people now are more aware of it.. i can talk about how people in the past reacted however i am trying to focus on present day media, because it is easyer to talk about from a my perspective because there are less opinions formed in a way, there is less writen and therefore easyer to try form my own opinion on present day stuff... if that makes ny sense..
User avatar
Direkt
Posts: 15205
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:38 am
Location: The Voir
Contact:

Post by Direkt »

sAme'0 wrote: if that makes ny sense..
:?: I would have thought coz there's more written and known about something then it would be easier to form your own objective perspective...
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

basicly what i am trying to say is because there is less written about it there is more for me to discover and look at. however with older stuff where lots have people have written about it there are already formed opinions and therefore harder to not form an opinion based on someone elses'.
User avatar
Hatsudai
Posts: 1454
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:05 pm
Location: up the road a bit
Contact:

Post by Hatsudai »

sAme'0 wrote:basicly what i am trying to say is because there is less written about it
Do you mean less written about the effects of the media/ a media on the public that is consuming it?

I think there are quite a few books on this topic....
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

i mean less written about things like video games, and more modern films rather than things like nazi propagander where there is an abundance of infomation
User avatar
Hatsudai
Posts: 1454
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:05 pm
Location: up the road a bit
Contact:

Post by Hatsudai »

I studied a lot of really contemporary media analysis in Uni about 3 years ago. There is an absolute glut of books and essays about the media and its effects in the past 10 years, esp internet and modern games.

If you get a chance spend a couple of hours in the RMIT library, people can't write books fast enough about this subject!


(sorry dude all my notes/books etc are in OZ so I cant give you any exact names)
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

Hatsudai wrote:I studied a lot of really contemporary media analysis in Uni about 3 years ago. There is an absolute glut of books and essays about the media and its effects in the past 10 years, esp internet and modern games.

If you get a chance spend a couple of hours in the RMIT library, people can't write books fast enough about this subject!


(sorry dude all my notes/books etc are in OZ so I cant give you any exact names)
sall good, my essays will be no longer than 1000 words, due to exams and what not... i will have to check out the library..
didnt really realise there was that much written bout it.. hopefully i can find enough stuff..
User avatar
Hatsudai
Posts: 1454
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:05 pm
Location: up the road a bit
Contact:

Post by Hatsudai »

Use your good old friend the internet aswell. Mr Google will lead you to some good essays, and if not Authors/book names.

i just found this in the last 30 secs

http://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/conf ... walsh.html

might be of interest... (esp bibliography :wink: )

Now thats all of your homework I'm doing :lol:
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

Hatsudai wrote:Use your good old friend the internet aswell. Mr Google will lead you to some good essays, and if not Authors/book names.

i just found this in the last 30 secs

http://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/conf ... walsh.html

might be of interest... (esp bibliography :wink: )

Now thats all of your homework I'm doing :lol:
thanx dude
User avatar
mrj
Posts: 13377
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:07 am
Location: the Penski file

Post by mrj »

tiggus85 wrote:if you get a chance Samo the picture search video store on swan st in richmond has a dodgy copy of Ken Park (its pretty full on, but beautifully shot) you just kinda have to ask for it like your buying drugs
you have to do it like you're buying drugs? you mean you have to do it in a very open manner in broad daylight on Russell st in front of several victorian police officers who can clearly see it but choose to look the other way and focus their attention on booking mrj for j-walking?
He's climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up.
User avatar
cobbernuts
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:28 pm

Post by cobbernuts »

booking mrj for j-walking
theres got to be a song in that


didn't think ken park was much of a movie.
i have it on dvd somewhere if it can't be rented.
How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?
Sustain
Posts: 1152
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 5:01 am
Contact:

Post by Sustain »

The most influential thing about the media (focusing on news) is the way in which it chooses the issues of the day- it can't tell you what to think, but it does tell you what to think about.

The massive media coverage of the Tampa affair made refugees the 2001 election issue. Many people went to the polls thinking about 'border protection' instead of thinking about welfare, health, education etc. In this sense the media can be very influential because they are essentially influencing the outcome of elections (especially when there's complusory voting) because beat-ups like the refugee thing is going to influence the way people vote.

Don't underestimate the power of the media
User avatar
Direkt
Posts: 15205
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:38 am
Location: The Voir
Contact:

Post by Direkt »

Sustain wrote: Don't underestimate the power of the media
"The greatest trick the Devil ever played was convincing the world he didn't exist" - I paraphrase. Spot on with what you said though - it's an often hidden/disguised power.
User avatar
mrj
Posts: 13377
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:07 am
Location: the Penski file

Post by mrj »

Direktor wrote:
Sustain wrote: Don't underestimate the power of the media
"The greatest trick the Devil ever played was convincing the world he didn't exist" - I paraphrase. Spot on with what you said though - it's an often hidden/disguised power.
best use of movie quote this year (paraphrasing not withstanding)

Direktor - It would be an honour if you would let me bear your children (as soon as medical science has made this a physical possiblity).
He's climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up.
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

mrj wrote:
Direktor wrote:
Sustain wrote: Don't underestimate the power of the media
"The greatest trick the Devil ever played was convincing the world he didn't exist" - I paraphrase. Spot on with what you said though - it's an often hidden/disguised power.
best use of movie quote this year (paraphrasing not withstanding)

Direktor - It would be an honour if you would let me bear your children (as soon as medical science has made this a physical possiblity).
i can make it happen.. dont underestemate the power of the peteybear
User avatar
Direkt
Posts: 15205
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:38 am
Location: The Voir
Contact:

Post by Direkt »

I am scared.... :smt045


:lol:
DBoy
Posts: 11265
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am

Post by DBoy »

i am curious.
User avatar
great_magnet
crazy diamond
Posts: 5290
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:48 am
Location: Bruns Vegas

Post by great_magnet »

I love lamp
This ain't no party
This ain't no disco
This ain't no foolin' around
User avatar
Reaper
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Limbo

Post by Reaper »

I love rice beans!
Reap what you sow bitches!
User avatar
same o
peteybear™
Posts: 9505
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by same o »

do u wanna come to my pants party??
Post Reply