The Movie/Film/DVD thread...

deviant · Post by **deviant** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:12 pm

Direkt wrote:horses for intercourses I guess....

totally incorrect.... you are wrong

how many times do we have to go over this!!!!

ghetto kitty · Post by **ghetto kitty** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:17 pm

word word word...

maggie and jake...
hot.

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:18 pm

deviant wrote:
Direkt wrote:horses for intercourses I guess....
totally incorrect.... you are wrong

how many times do we have to go over this!!!!

6 times

FoundationStepper · Post by **FoundationStepper** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:29 pm

mrj wrote:
DBoy wrote:Penn did get the Oscar by the way, for lead actor, Ledgers was for support role.
lol, yeh he did. i actually hadn't read the stuff yet but yeh he did.

i dunno i just get over the whole formulaic awarding of stuff, if a pretty girl uglies up then BANG oscar, if a guy plays a homo BANG oscar >> and if need precedent I'm talking Ledger for Brokeback, Seymour Hoffman for Capote, Hanks for Philadelphia yadda yadda yadda.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... o_gervais/

youthful_implants · Post by **youthful_implants** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:31 pm

Maggie is hot in the Secretary in a kooky, tie me up and spank the shit out of me, kind of way.

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:32 pm

I must be living in Bizzaro World today....

Post by **huge** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:11 pm

nothing wrong with a bit of maggie imo.

ghetto kitty · Post by **ghetto kitty** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:45 pm

youthful_implants wrote:Maggie is hot in the Secretary in a kooky, tie me up and spank the shit out of me, kind of way.

as opposed to im a stepford wife and look, i made you a bunt cake with my legs together kind of way?

deviant · Post by **deviant** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:18 pm

FoundationStepper wrote:
mrj wrote:
DBoy wrote:Penn did get the Oscar by the way, for lead actor, Ledgers was for support role.
lol, yeh he did. i actually hadn't read the stuff yet but yeh he did.

i dunno i just get over the whole formulaic awarding of stuff, if a pretty girl uglies up then BANG oscar, if a guy plays a homo BANG oscar >> and if need precedent I'm talking Ledger for Brokeback, Seymour Hoffman for Capote, Hanks for Philadelphia yadda yadda yadda.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... o_gervais/

"purple headed womb ferret"

quick · Post by **quick** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:50 pm

Direkt wrote:I must be living in Bizzaro World today....

you are the bizzaro man.. Maggie is soooo win...

your not into the 'girl next door' look??? wtf? so your only into the 'porn star on tv' look?

youthful_implants · Post by **youthful_implants** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:00 pm

ghetto kitty wrote:
youthful_implants wrote:Maggie is hot in the Secretary in a kooky, tie me up and spank the shit out of me, kind of way.
as opposed to im a stepford wife and look, i made you a bunt cake with my legs together kind of way?

I dont understand, are you agreeing with me?

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:22 am

quick wrote:
Direkt wrote:I must be living in Bizzaro World today....
you are the bizzaro man.. Maggie is soooo win...

your not into the 'girl next door' look??? wtf? so your only into the 'porn star on tv' look?

I must be Bizzaro Man.

And yep, it's true - plain-Jane doesn't do it for me... coz, she's plain. She's normal.
How does normal stand out from the crowd... it doesn't, that's how.

Porn star look - sure... no problem there. No problem with beautiful, striking, sexy, classical or statuesque either.

Bizzaro Man out.

Lizkins · Post by **Lizkins** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:43 am

i think its Maggie's voice that does it for me, kinda rough and sexy.

on the Jake goodness Witty, HELLO!!!

deviant · Post by **deviant** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:53 am

but mark, I thought we esablished that she is not plain....

urrrgh

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:55 am

Perhaps you had Dan.

Hardy · Post by **Hardy** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:56 am

I would definitely kick the back doors in on Maggie. Just putting it out there.

Polecat · Post by **Polecat** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:23 am

^ hmmm hardly a charming turn of phrase Hardy!

mrj · Post by **mrj** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:57 am

Direkt wrote:
quick wrote:
Direkt wrote:I must be living in Bizzaro World today....
you are the bizzaro man.. Maggie is soooo win...

your not into the 'girl next door' look??? wtf? so your only into the 'porn star on tv' look?
I must be Bizzaro Man.

And yep, it's true - plain-Jane doesn't do it for me... coz, she's plain. She's normal.
How does normal stand out from the crowd... it doesn't, that's how.

Porn star look - sure... no problem there. No problem with beautiful, striking, sexy, classical or statuesque either.

Bizzaro Man out.

yeh see you are missing the picture entirely here, plain or girl next doory looking lass (which I believe are not the same category) are part of a whole growing up reminiscenty kinda thing that brings with it fonds memories of fumbling in the dark and "and then she unzippred her jumper" stories on school camps.

quid quo pro >> plain girls are hot, hot girls are not.

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:04 pm

Fucks sake.

I don't dig her.

I find her plain. I find her dull. I find her boring. I find her meh. That's my point.

Find her however you please.

I grew up with heaps of girls I find attractive, if Maggie was in my year level or my next door neighbour - she wouldn't have been one of them.

Hardy · Post by **Hardy** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:22 pm

In Direkts defence, I don't think she's anything to write home about.

mrj · Post by **mrj** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:25 pm

yeh okay it was just a discussion tho. its not like we are trying to turn you gay or anything.

Hardy · Post by **Hardy** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:42 pm

mrj wrote:yeh okay it was just a discussion tho. its not like we are trying to turn you gay or anything.

I read between the lines, and now fancy Dave from accounts payable. I hope you're happy, now my my Mum will never be a grandmother.

Lizkins · Post by **Lizkins** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:42 pm

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:00 pm

It's just a discussion, for sure... But I find it odd when people say "you've missed the point" on topics of opinion.

She's not ugly, she's just very plain looking IMO. But, I'm once again in the minority here. No worries.

PS: I always took "girl next door" to mean someone more accessible than a glamorous movie star. Someone more, "run of the mill" perhaps. Someone more "real".

deviant · Post by **deviant** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:26 pm

Hardy wrote:In Direkts defence, I don't think she's anything to write home about.

so, let me get this straight..... If you got with Maggie Gyllenhal you would NOT think that was anything special enough to brag about?

hmmmmm

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:29 pm

He's not talking about her fame mate. Her looks.

I.e. conversation on her relative "hotness".

ghetto kitty · Post by **ghetto kitty** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:49 pm

at everyone gettin narky with direkt's taste in movie star fantasies.

once more...

FullGain · Post by **FullGain** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:54 pm

I'm liking the new Watchmen movie. As good as the comic? Dunno.

Hardy · Post by **Hardy** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:07 pm

Direkt wrote:He's not talking about her fame mate. Her looks.

I.e. conversation on her relative "hotness".

Precisely. If I were to give her one or whatever i'd be taking out full page ads in The Age, but it would only be because of her fame, and possibly as blackmail for money. Nowt to do with her looks.

deviant · Post by **deviant** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:12 pm

Hardy · Post by **Hardy** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:21 pm

Why would anyone lie about that?

deviant · Post by **deviant** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:36 pm

stop hating on me hardy....

Hardy · Post by **Hardy** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:41 pm

tee193 · Post by **tee193** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:37 pm

watched step brothers last night, seems WIll Farrel has his mojo back after the last couple of movies.

sooo many activities! hahaha

mecka · Post by **mecka** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:46 pm

Maggie Gylenhaal (or how the fuck you spell her name) looks like shes had the sides of her face squashed and slightly smushed down.

Looks like a sad puppy imo.

mrj · Post by **mrj** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:43 am

lol, she does look like a sad puppy actually.

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:58 am

mrj wrote:lol, she does look like a sad puppy actually.

mrj finds sad puppies sexually attractive!?!

Gliding High · Post by **Gliding High** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:03 am

Watched 'The Wrestler' the other night.
Dug it, but I thought the ending lacked a bit of detail, and this detracted overall from the film.
Mickey Rourke has come along as an older actor - I never rated him before he played Marv in Sin City.

apophenian · Post by **apophenian** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:09 am

I thought the wrestler was the best cinematic interpretation of the Jesus myth for a while. So many references there...

Gliding High · Post by **Gliding High** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:23 am

apophenian wrote:I thought the wrestler was the best cinematic interpretation of the Jesus myth for a while. So many references there...

I never thought of it like that - but your absolutely right.

Wonder if Jesus ever hung out in titty bars??

mrj · Post by **mrj** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:26 am

Direkt wrote:
mrj wrote:lol, she does look like a sad puppy actually.
mrj finds sad puppies sexually attractive!?!

rofl, looks like it.

now if you'll ecuse me I have to go and......uh......volunteer........
down at the lost dogs home.

Feigan · Post by **Feigan** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:28 am

^ heading to see this next week @ Moonlight - looking fwd to it.

Direkt · Post by **Direkt** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:31 am

mrj wrote:
Direkt wrote:
mrj wrote:lol, she does look like a sad puppy actually.
mrj finds sad puppies sexually attractive!?!
rofl, looks like it.

now if you'll ecuse me I have to go and......uh......volunteer........
down at the lost dogs home.

Lizkins · Post by **Lizkins** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:01 pm

watched Role Models with mecka last night. fricken lols a plenty, so many good lines. must watch again.

GH - nice av, i love that show. new series starting back again. WOOT!

youthful_implants · Post by **youthful_implants** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:53 pm

my mate Ben at the Guardian reckons Watchmen is damn good!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog ... een-hornet

mecka · Post by **mecka** » Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:25 am

So I went and caught the 11pm screening of Watchmen at IMAX.

Go and see this film.

My thoughts on it are so jumbled and incoherant and mixed and full on that its impossible to write even a brief review of the film save for three words:

It. Is. Awesome.

Also, Jim Jarmusch has a new film coming out! Limits of Control.

and the new Star Trek trailer looks fucking awesome.

apophenian · Post by **apophenian** » Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:40 am

Awesome - really want to see it - is it worth the extra $$ for imax in your opinion mecka?

mecka · Post by **mecka** » Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:13 pm

Yeah - the sound alone is phenomenal

Post by **system** » Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:51 pm

mecka wrote:So I went and caught the 11pm screening of Watchmen at IMAX.

Go and see this film.

saw it at imax on thursday. recommended. it's a bit flawed (big fan of the original comic and therefore suffering from purist bias), but a very good effort at adapting a difficult work to film. well worth seeing on a very big screen as it is an epic show.

hankering to see the 'black freighter' now, really should have been included in there too.

kronz · Post by **kronz** » Sun Mar 08, 2009 5:14 pm

mecka wrote:So I went and caught the 11pm screening of Watchmen at IMAX.

Go and see this film.

My thoughts on it are so jumbled and incoherant and mixed and full on that its impossible to write even a brief review of the film save for three words:

It. Is. Awesome.

Also, Jim Jarmusch has a new film coming out! Limits of Control.

and the new Star Trek trailer looks fucking awesome.

I saw the watchman last night, I loved it and hated it all at once. I think the second half was a bit wak but the first was sick.

to new Star Trek