Home Printer
Home Printer
Looking up printers for home. For a Mac - as apparently some are only PC compatible?!? Darkages
Prefer a scanner too. Like nice enough qaulity to be able to print invites etc - but no need for professional standard. But certianly don't want paper jam every other page or to pay $$$,$$$ for new cartrigdges.
Would investigate myself but I have you bunch of know it alls to start me off.
Prefer a scanner too. Like nice enough qaulity to be able to print invites etc - but no need for professional standard. But certianly don't want paper jam every other page or to pay $$$,$$$ for new cartrigdges.
Would investigate myself but I have you bunch of know it alls to start me off.
Re: Home Printer
i like hp still ... i got a wifi printer/scanner/copier for $99 from officeworks last year, boomtown.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
Re: Home Printer
just get one of those $100 lasers from officeworks and when it runs out of toner, piff it and buy a new one huhu.
stupid toners!
my bizz partner bought 2 hp all in ones from greys auctions for $5 for both of them. when printers are a 10th of the price ofthe toner/ink then shit just doesn't make sense.
on a serious note, if you want an all in one the canon pixma goes ok. wireless too. no idea what the ink usage or price is tho
stupid toners!
my bizz partner bought 2 hp all in ones from greys auctions for $5 for both of them. when printers are a 10th of the price ofthe toner/ink then shit just doesn't make sense.
on a serious note, if you want an all in one the canon pixma goes ok. wireless too. no idea what the ink usage or price is tho
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
- FoundationStepper
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:55 am
Re: Home Printer
the 'printerjam' is a good a'lround model, made by mistabishi I think
dadjokes
dadjokes
croaking lizard... jungletasticdubcorebadness (brap brap)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
surface resonance... sound and vibration arts (buzz hum)
Re: Home Printer
huge wrote:just get one of those $100 lasers from officeworks and when it runs out of toner, piff it and buy a new one huhu.
stupid toners!
my bizz partner bought 2 hp all in ones from greys auctions for $5 for both of them. when printers are a 10th of the price ofthe toner/ink then shit just doesn't make sense.
on a serious note, if you want an all in one the canon pixma goes ok. wireless too. no idea what the ink usage or price is tho
Re: Home Printer
lol hugh those printers only come with a half full toner... cheaper to buy new toner not new printer.
Dboy... The pixmas are pretty good but inks are exy unless you buy third party. The other option is to go with a Continuous Inking System, which allows you to hook up tanks of ink as opposed to cartridges. Much, much cheaper to run that way.
As for models, look at the Canon MP560 or MP640. 640 does duplex printing and has better print quality overall. The new HPs go alright too. Check out the Photosmart Plus. Can be had for about $140 and is slightly cheaper to run than the Canons.
Dboy... The pixmas are pretty good but inks are exy unless you buy third party. The other option is to go with a Continuous Inking System, which allows you to hook up tanks of ink as opposed to cartridges. Much, much cheaper to run that way.
As for models, look at the Canon MP560 or MP640. 640 does duplex printing and has better print quality overall. The new HPs go alright too. Check out the Photosmart Plus. Can be had for about $140 and is slightly cheaper to run than the Canons.
- ghetto kitty
- Posts: 13157
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 1:40 pm
- Contact:
- kiss & tell
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Home Printer
I will actually need a new black ink toner when I get back home, hardly ever print colour
- Sociopathic
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:58 pm
- Location: on my ass
Re: Home Printer
Me and my dad have always had cannon printers, never had any issues with them at all. Good pricing usually too. Tend to buy from office works just for pricing and I have issues with customer service from palces like hardley normal.
The fridge is angry, the cheese told me so.
Watch out for the penguins, they are comming.
Watch out for the penguins, they are comming.
- Sociopathic
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:58 pm
- Location: on my ass
Re: Home Printer
Ps. when I say me and my dad have always had them I get his hand me downs usually. He has a thing with upgrading regardless of whether he really needs to. He bought a brother printer/scanner/copier/fax and within a week went and bought a new cannon because he wasn't quite happy with the way a certain picture turned out when he printed it.
He also goes and does retail therapy at places like dicksmith because "he's bored" and has nothing better to waste money on so he has had quite a fair few of printers mainly by cannon and never a problem
He also goes and does retail therapy at places like dicksmith because "he's bored" and has nothing better to waste money on so he has had quite a fair few of printers mainly by cannon and never a problem
The fridge is angry, the cheese told me so.
Watch out for the penguins, they are comming.
Watch out for the penguins, they are comming.
Re: Home Printer
Makes my heart warm a touch.Sociopathic wrote:Tend to buy from office works just for pricing and I have issues with customer service from palces like hardley normal.
STEER CLEAR OF BROTHER INKJETS
They are utter balls, cost a fuckload to run and break down really, really quickly.
I like Canon, but as mentioned, they're real expensive to run (they are changing over their range at the moment - stay tuned for more updates). HP are a good balance between features and running cost, although they tend to have paper jams more than the other units (due to front feeding paper) and their customer service is fucking atrocious. Epson are also a good balance, but their units cost slightly more (Epson are also refreshing their range at the moment). Lexmark... forget about Lexmark printers. Same with Dell. I hate dealing with Dell.
Come December they're introducing a 20%/cost price staff discount for OW. If anybody needs anything, hit me up with a PM. Can't guarantee that I will always be able to get stuff but I can certainly try.
EDIT: http://www.rihac.com.au/ do CISS systems that can save you an arseload of money if you do alot of printing.
- witty_pseudonym
- Posts: 11779
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:53 am
- Location: betwixt and between
Re: Home Printer
mecka wrote:
Come December they're introducing a 20%/cost price staff discount for OW. If anybody needs anything, hit me up with a PM. Can't guarantee that I will always be able to get stuff but I can certainly try.
...
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
Re: Home Printer
i should add that i have never had a printer at home so maybe you shouldn't listen to me. huhu. all my experience is with $80k xerox machines huhu
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
Re: Home Printer
Cheers peoples. Sounds like I lean towards Epson and Canon from Officeworks. Will let you know what I end up doing.
- unsoundbwoy
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:17 am
Re: Home Printer
i got a canon pixma mp-640, officeworks $188, wireless on a mac no problems, print quality all good, can print onto CDs, still on the first inks so i dunno how efficient it is but, so far so good.
Re: Home Printer
Mp640s are on the way out. Good printer thoughunsoundbwoy wrote:i got a canon pixma mp-640, officeworks $188, wireless on a mac no problems, print quality all good, can print onto CDs, still on the first inks so i dunno how efficient it is but, so far so good.