Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:38 am
who's having it? Jeff Mills ftw
major lazer, wiley, infected mushroom, ric villalobos, carl cox etc would be fun to see but all in all fairly meh imho
also robyn has cancelled
Page 1 of 2
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:05 am
tbh the only act on that bill i'd fork out hard earned to see would be redshape
major lazer, wiley, infected mushroom, ric villalobos, carl cox etc would be fun to see but all in all fairly meh imho
also robyn has cancelled
major lazer, wiley, infected mushroom, ric villalobos, carl cox etc would be fun to see but all in all fairly meh imho
also robyn has cancelled
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:26 am
aroes wrote:tbh the only act on that bill i'd fork out hard earned to see would be redshape
major lazer, wiley, infected mushroom, ric villalobos, carl cox etc would be fun to see but all in all fairly meh imho
also robyn has cancelled
I wouldn't pay for it either tbh
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:39 am
so you're in cahoots with kiss & tell
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:13 am
I would just want to see caspa, haven't seen him play since laundry heavy innit years n years ago....
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:03 pm
Hell yeah! We're goin to sizzlah 
woop!
Millsy, Infected mushy, Wiley, Caspa....
Bring on the sunscreen & UDLs!!!!!
woop!Millsy, Infected mushy, Wiley, Caspa....
Bring on the sunscreen & UDLs!!!!!
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:53 pm
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:54 pm
whats the cost Tori?
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:26 pm
dunno quicky 
hungy plus i think.... i got a golden ticket!
u should come tho!! msg me if u decide to, haven't caught up in forever!!!!! xo
hungy plus i think.... i got a golden ticket! u should come tho!! msg me if u decide to, haven't caught up in forever!!!!! xo
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:49 pm
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:44 am
nic would of love it
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:17 pm
wiley only played for 15mins apparently lol caspa had no bass and it was quiet lol villalobos had every song skip with shitty vinyl lol jeff mills was train tracking 80% of the time lol tiesto apparently played electro house lol cream stage was dead all day lol dj sneak played in front of 30 people lol
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:23 pm
disappointed but not surprised
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:41 pm
oh yeah I forgot, onelove has made a dubstep compilation mixed by kid kenobi lol
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:42 pm
boobies
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:11 pm
deviant wrote:boobies
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 7:23 pm
...and lots of dudes with no shirts on....
wat a zoo
wat a zoo
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:28 pm
guess it was lucky u weren't there then lol.djgrl wrote:wiley only played for 15mins apparently lol caspa had no bass and it was quiet lol villalobos had every song skip with shitty vinyl lol jeff mills was train tracking 80% of the time lol tiesto apparently played electro house lol cream stage was dead all day lol dj sneak played in front of 30 people lol
nah wiley played for halfa and was on the main stage so got stuck with a techno crowd jammed in from the last performer. Caspas levels were fine as far as i could tell considering most of the acts were techno styles and full treble. too much bass might have made people huck. the crowd was going nuts for caspa, proper rave style in a shed! MC azlan was DOPE. awesome to see how far melb dubstep has moved. i'm sure the young main stream muzzas & metro sexuals screaming all the lyrics with hands in the air would have pissed off any true dubsteper... whatever. i think it was brilliant and had an awesome time. having fun is only a problem when u don't know how... jeff mills dropped some oldschool tunes, bit of dave clark & schumacher... and my absolute highlight was infected mushrooms take on foo fighters pretender. had a fucking ball
and yeah it was a total zoo. there was so much too see in such a short time and sooo many people... some mega hotties tho and a whole lotta boobies hehe woop 
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:50 am
pics plz
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:53 am
that's it, i only play pre- and post-dubstep now
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:15 am
HAHAHAHAHA SUMMER OF DUBSTEP!!!!! Alright!
Guess u underground djs will have to start pushing grime & glitch more now that dubstep has hit the commercial market! Awesome
Guess u underground djs will have to start pushing grime & glitch more now that dubstep has hit the commercial market!
Awesome i don't know how to post pictures without having to up load them all on picasa and stuff which is too hard atm... or i'm too much of a spaz. :Shuge wrote:pics plz
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:28 pm
stupid elitist attitude tbh....
oh noes, people are starting to like my niche underground genre..... I better stop liking it now.
music is music, it still sounds the same regardless of how many or what type of people like it, or what festivals it get's played at.
oh noes, people are starting to like my niche underground genre..... I better stop liking it now.
music is music, it still sounds the same regardless of how many or what type of people like it, or what festivals it get's played at.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:36 pm
I though it was a mad rave ... tbh
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:39 pm
flux pavilion has 47,418 fans on facebookdeviant wrote:stupid elitist attitude tbh....
oh noes, people are starting to like my niche underground genre..... I better stop liking it now.
music is music, it still sounds the same regardless of how many or what type of people like it, or what festivals it get's played at.
dubsteps gone viral.
http://www.facebook.com/fluxpavilion
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:43 pm
i think its better when anything 'underground' goes big, more tunes, more challenge, more fans, more of it played at shopping malls rather than crap pop.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:57 pm
yeah and check out his studio! keepin it real yo.ghetto kitty wrote:i think its better when anything 'underground' goes big, more tunes, more challenge, more fans, more of it played at shopping malls rather than crap pop.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 1:28 pm
True, the more people that like it the better imo.deviant wrote:stupid elitist attitude tbh....
oh noes, people are starting to like my niche underground genre..... I better stop liking it now.
music is music, it still sounds the same regardless of how many or what type of people like it, or what festivals it get's played at.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:54 pm
true that!! breaks stayed goo.... ohh waitdeviant wrote:stupid elitist attitude tbh....
oh noes, people are starting to like my niche underground genre..... I better stop liking it now.
music is music, it still sounds the same regardless of how many or what type of people like it, or what festivals it get's played at.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:49 pm
dusbtep sold out a long time ago anyway
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:55 pm
stfu
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:00 pm
i dunno... there is something good about music staying 'underground'... well from the passionate punters point of view... with less popularity, money will have less influence on music and artistic integrity... this is not always the case but when a genre gets bigger, in general the $$$ influences the sound and imo, for the worse
obviously is better for the artists when it gains popularity... and i think there are pros and cons for both sides
obviously is better for the artists when it gains popularity... and i think there are pros and cons for both sides
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:15 pm
it was a joke dan ...deviant wrote:stupid elitist attitude tbh....
oh noes, people are starting to like my niche underground genre..... I better stop liking it now.
music is music, it still sounds the same regardless of how many or what type of people like it, or what festivals it get's played at.
also the tracklist is fucking awful: http://www.inthemix.com.au/news/aust/48 ... do_dubstep
also also, if nine million people liked the same music i do, that'd be rad. but midrange tearout is (almost without exception) complete shit which i didn't like before it was popular and don't like now ... do i have to like it just because that's what people say dubstep is now?
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:22 am
@bok_bok i really really try and hold back from genre talk especially on twitter but CAN EVERYONE STOP SAYING THE PHRASE POST-DUBSTEP #noreply #pls
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:49 am
^^ loltown
good point quick
good point quick
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:01 am
I would imagine the fact that dubstep has been appropriated by bazillions of kids with no interest in its roots is what really annoys the old skoolers.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:38 am
EDIT - Where'd that tune go?
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:54 am
hahaha
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:10 am
Yeah I know people who have told me exactly that, but personally I try to appreciate music for how it actually affects me rather than any historical lineage it may have.youthful_implants wrote:I would imagine the fact that dubstep has been appropriated by bazillions of kids with no interest in its roots is what really annoys the old skoolers.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:23 am
deeepfooishbar wrote: midrange tearout is
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:58 am
I always thought Boom Bye Bye by Buju Banton was an awesome tune, then I found out it was about shooting gay peopleapophenian wrote:
Yeah I know people who have told me exactly that, but personally I try to appreciate music for how it actually affects me rather than any historical lineage it may have.
It's still a catchy little ditty, but I'd be lying if I said my opinion of it wasn't somewhat tainted
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:34 pm
All you are really saying is that your opinion of the song was influenced by the content of it, which you had failed to properly understand up until that point.
My argument is that the content of a piece of music is more important than whether some producer I may not have heard of was producing dubstep way back in 2000.
My argument is that the content of a piece of music is more important than whether some producer I may not have heard of was producing dubstep way back in 2000.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:48 pm
facepalm
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:23 pm
lol the lineage is important to some people though obviously, as it shapes what the music means to them.
the mutation of music is a wonderful thing except when it stops being something you like anymore.
I remember when tech step drum n bass disappeared up its own arse at the end of the 90s when a lot of producers seemed to be making music as obscure and abstract as possible (Dom and Roland, Stakka and Skynet, Aquasky, Metalheadz), some of it you could call art, a lot of it also killed dancefloors and seemed to move away from the original dancehall flavours of the sound.
There was a a lot of music made in that period with sonically interesting palettes that were seriously lacking in groove,
You could argue sonically that tearout dubstep has a lot of the same elements as tech step did at the end of the 90s, but you couldn't say it was killing dancefloors because people seem to love it.
the mutation of music is a wonderful thing except when it stops being something you like anymore.
I remember when tech step drum n bass disappeared up its own arse at the end of the 90s when a lot of producers seemed to be making music as obscure and abstract as possible (Dom and Roland, Stakka and Skynet, Aquasky, Metalheadz), some of it you could call art, a lot of it also killed dancefloors and seemed to move away from the original dancehall flavours of the sound.
There was a a lot of music made in that period with sonically interesting palettes that were seriously lacking in groove,
You could argue sonically that tearout dubstep has a lot of the same elements as tech step did at the end of the 90s, but you couldn't say it was killing dancefloors because people seem to love it.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:26 pm
this and only this imho.youthful_implants wrote: the mutation of music is a wonderful thing except when it stops being something you like anymore.
which is why i go to dubstep parties, am listening to house, and get shitty.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:35 pm
different vibe innit, mostly.
I dont mind house music that sounds like dubstep that thinks its breaks. Thats fine.
Its just the oompa loompa gospel handbag shit that makes me spew.
I dont mind house music that sounds like dubstep that thinks its breaks. Thats fine.
Its just the oompa loompa gospel handbag shit that makes me spew.
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:44 pm
youthful_implants wrote: house music that sounds like dubstep that thinks its breaks.
personality disorder?
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:47 pm
yeah or genre-blurring I guess.ghetto kitty wrote:youthful_implants wrote: house music that sounds like dubstep that thinks its breaks.
personality disorder?
Re: Stereosonic
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:53 pm
it was the 'thinks' that made me laugh.