Page 1 of 3

Derrick May (comments about Melbs)

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:37 pm
by lucas
Melbourne is the centre , the epitaph, of the music scene in Australia. Plain and simple. Sydney in particular, didn’t seem to have much balls in the music scene. Some good clubs there, but there wasn’t the substance, the quality or the talent that was being developed in Melbourne. I think that somehow, between Sydney and Melbourne, the scene was liquidated somehow. It still exists, sure, but it doesn’t exist freehand anymore. It’s become more of a corporate scene. You don’t see these young promoters running around anymore fired up, aspiring to do the things that were done to get people like me to Australia thirteen or fourteen years ago. In a city like Melbourne, if there’s internal fighting, it’s going to disrupt the scene. It is an awful, awful thing. It really is. It is a terrible thing. I can’t stand to see it happen. It does happen a lot from time to time, and I have watched it happen in Melbourne. Detroit survived because we didn’t have that. The artists have to communicate. They don’t have to love each other, but they do have to respect each other.
Interview in full: http://www.tranzfusion.net/articles/sho ... ewsid=5778

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:40 pm
by DBoy
:!:

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:43 pm
by sneaky hands
economics 101: in any industry, competitors must first cooperate to grow the whole pie, and only then can they compete for their slice.

otherwise youre just destroying value.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:46 pm
by JAMESSSS
That is probably the best electronic music interview I have ever read.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:50 pm
by shepherd
wow, derrick may is now an expert on the melbourne scene. we all better listen to the all knowing!

:teef:

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:53 pm
by DBoy
Despite weather he is all knowing or not, it is interesting that someone from the outside would make such a comment.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:56 pm
by JAMESSSS
shepherd wrote:wow, derrick may is now an expert on the melbourne scene. we all better listen to the all knowing!

:teef:
Well my magic 8 ball is broken so what the hell else can I do?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:57 pm
by deviant
sneaky hands wrote:economics 101: in any industry, competitors must first cooperate to grow the whole pie, and only then can they compete for their slice.

otherwise youre just destroying value.
:scr1pt:

On a lighter note, I don't think that the scene down here is really that bad, in the way of fighting and bickering. I've seen much worse in other scenes and other industrys.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:58 pm
by lucas
Whether or not you think he's got a good grip on what's happening in Melbs; I think what he's saying is still valid.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:01 pm
by lynt
:scr1pt: x :scr1pt:

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:01 pm
by deviant
^^^ yeah, I totally agree with what he is saying. I just don't think it's as bad here as it could be or is elsewhere that is all.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:07 pm
by cj the taniwha
deviant wrote:^^^ yeah, I totally agree with what he is saying. I just don't think it's as bad here as it could be or is elsewhere that is all.
well it is a hell of a lot worse here than it was in Bristol - lots more communication and collaboration happening there and a much healthier scene for most genres of electronic music with a population of 400k - but i think there are other social and financial reasons for that too.

I agree completely that there needs to be more 'pie growth' collaborative efforts to get the next generations of youngsters into the scene.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:10 pm
by JAMESSSS
I think (as far as DnB goes) just the fact it's Bristol helps too.

Although Christchurch on a population of 350,000 used to regularly rock 600-800 people at dnb internationals.

Bad Company after Shot Down On Safari got over 1K.

Not that any of this is really related to anything. Just interesting.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:24 pm
by deviant
I see the bickering, I know it happens.... Maybe it's just never really effected anything that I've actually tried to do. Maybe I'll think differently if it ever does effect my projects.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:27 pm
by betson
Things are startin to get better, for breaks I think.

Out where I live it's all whatever's on the radio ie flaunt it etc. Thank god for JJJ, pushin alot of breaks lately and it's startin to make the genre alot more recognised amongst EDM fans, the crew around here are wanting to hear more.

JJJ are definatley helpin the pie grow in country areas.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:30 pm
by nic
more breaks n dnb parties.
but they havent really worked that well have they.

as a 'punta' im completely oblivious to any bickering whatsoever?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:32 pm
by deviant
^^^ don't you read MB? :teef:

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:41 pm
by Miss Bee
nic wrote:more breaks n dnb parties.
but they havent really worked that well have they.

as a 'punta' im completely oblivious to any bickering whatsoever?
:lol:

Half the problem (IMO) is there is far to many little nights competing over the same small pool of people that have always gone out, rather than people working together to put on something mid sized and decent and attract a new crowd.

Kenny Larkin last week was a prime example of a party that was excellently promoted, support line up was excellent (with a variety of DJs from different genres and different social circles) and playpen was RAMMED with punters.

I thought this was relevant from the interview too..

"A scene only loses its intelligence when it moves out into a kind of vast wasteland where substance abuse and music pollution are allowed to exist, where certain things can?t be controlled anymore. When Detroit techno becomes just techno. When it becomes the music where any idiot with a computer can call himself a techno artist today, and tomorrow, be working in the bank doing mortgages. "

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:41 pm
by sweetcheeks
that was an awesome read. derrick may is a legend.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:44 pm
by mrj
sneaky hands wrote:grow the whole pie
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..................................grow pie

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:46 pm
by dust
Miss Bee wrote:
nic wrote:more breaks n dnb parties.
but they havent really worked that well have they.

as a 'punta' im completely oblivious to any bickering whatsoever?
:lol:

Half the problem (IMO) is there is far to many little nights competing over the same small pool of people that have always gone out, rather than people working together to put on something mid sized and decent and attract a new crowd.

Kenny Larkin last week was a prime example of a party that was excellently promoted, support line up was excellent (with a variety of DJs from different genres and different social circles) and playpen was RAMMED with punters.

I thought this was relevant from the interview too..

"A scene only loses its intelligence when it moves out into a kind of vast wasteland where substance abuse and music pollution are allowed to exist, where certain things can?t be controlled anymore. When Detroit techno becomes just techno. When it becomes the music where any idiot with a computer can call himself a techno artist today, and tomorrow, be working in the bank doing mortgages. "
:scr1pt:

This is definitely evident in the d'n'b scene.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:57 pm
by shepherd
The guy makes for good quotes, but i think what he says is essentially rubbish.

I'd really like to know what he means by that general comment.

Intelligence in a scene - ffs, it's dance music.

:S:S ""A scene only loses its intelligence when it moves out into a kind of vast wasteland where substance abuse and music pollution are allowed to exist, where certain things can?t be controlled anymore. When Detroit techno becomes just techno. When it becomes the music where any idiot with a computer can call himself a techno artist today, and tomorrow, be working in the bank doing mortgages. "

Sorry to not be lining up to dickride the guy, but I don't get it :|

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:03 pm
by Direkt
You don't wanna dickride him?

Why not?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:04 pm
by lucas
*sigh*

Whatevs.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:06 pm
by dust
I don't think everyone is lining up to 'dickride' as you so eloquently put it.

Just interesting to note that an international act has perhaps picked up on some issues that our scene and people on this board have been discussing for a long time now.

There have been so many discussions here about where the scene is going wrong and how internal in-fighting have plagued particularly the d'n'b and breaks scene here and i think it is a worry that touring artists have noticed it too.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:13 pm
by marcus
Miss Bee wrote:
Half the problem (IMO) is there is far to many little nights competing over the same small pool of people that have always gone out, rather than people working together to put on something mid sized and decent and attract a new crowd.
Melbourne is blessed with talents DJ's. A number of my mates are wicked DJ's who don't usually play out. How are they all supposed to get a gig? The little nights provide a perfect outlet for those to get out and strut their stuff, learn the trade, and be available for those bigger events. It also provides healthy competition amongst all DJ's which will help them to improve their skills. So I don't think there being too many little nights causes too much of a problem. Granted, those small events on the same night as another event will cause a problem, but that can be worked out with promoters carefully choosing when they have their event and the lineup they choose.

I strongly agree with your second point re attracting a larger crowd. It's something I am always thinking about with my night and parties and I'm associated with. In terms of breakbeat, I think there would be less than 1000 people who follow it with keen interest and be at a party every month. I may be wrong with this figure, but I base it on the number of people I've seen at breakbeat events in Melbourne the past 6 months (which is quite a few of them). In short, you have to get out there and promote your gig every weekend to different people in bars etc, and drum up interest in music publications, universities etc.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:33 pm
by deviant
I don't wanna argue about whether there is too much arguing..... seems pretty pointless, the negativity doesn't have to effect you if you don't let it.

I agree with Ben to a degree, I read the comment about the bedroom producers and it made me cringe. I felt it was an "elitist" comment, basically like "we are the original techno producers and always will be"...

If you are producing and working at the bank TO FEED YOUR FAMILY then that is more than OK with me, we need more bedroom producers to keep pumping out tunes for the scene, the more local ones the better.

I always play local beats, I totally dig playing BluePrint, Thayer, Hook n Sling, poxy music, mangan, nubreed, dopamine, chable etc etc.... not just because they are local (some sydney, but local as in ozzie) but because they are GOOD.

EDIT: BTW Lucas, you started the discussion, surely you could imput something more constructive than "whatevs". I know you and Ben have had "tiffs" on here before and yeah, he made his point quite crassly BUT that's Ben, he made a valid point IMO

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:41 pm
by lucas
deviant wrote:EDIT: BTW Lucas, you started the discussion, surely you could imput something more constructive than "whatevs". I know you and Ben have had "tiffs" on here before and yeah, he made his point quite crassly BUT that's Ben, he made a valid point IMO
Yep. And I'm happy to have a civil discussion about it. Not really up for anything below the belt today. *shrugs*

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:49 pm
by shepherd
lucas wrote:*sigh*

Whatevs.
lol lucas - why do you assume i'm talking about you dude ... I'm just making a comment about something I think is nonsense.

*Sigh* - please ...

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:52 pm
by shepherd
How is what I am saying 'crass' ... i used the word 'dickride' and that is pretty much the only lowbrow comment I've made.

My point was 'who is derrick may to make a comment about Melbourne?' He is hardly qualified in my opinion.

And remember - Derrick May talks up innovation and all kinds of other jazz ... lets not remember that Strings of Life was horrendously covered last year and signed globally to MOS, given a shocking diva vocal overlay and licenced to ANY compilation that wanted it.

If May really cared about innovation and dance music not being a commodity he would never have let his signature record be abused like that.

Great quote - but it holds no value coming from a Detroit has been.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:31 pm
by AJ
Don't forget that Derrick was managed by former Melburnian Richard Marr for quite some time (might still be, not sure), so any view of Melbourne would definitely be skewed by his viewpoints.

In other words, just say Marr was annoyed at some other promoter who took on his Innovator parties or something - there may be an underlying motive.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:45 pm
by shepherd
what do you mean AJ? Derrick's words skewed by a vested interest?? No waaaaaaaay ;)

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:53 pm
by nic
Where are the breaks parties on the same scale and level of interest as calyx, pendulum etc ?

The ones everyone loves that are rammed.

I cant remember the last 'big' breaks party I went to like that. But im sure calyx on sat will be like that.

'small' parties like stylus are great and dont detract from any scene, most of teh people there are regulars anyway or associated with those who go. Stylus for one is always diverse and has a great atmosphere. Prob why its pretty much always good.

Where else would I get to hear peeps like SWM and Lephrenian get to play out at?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 3:59 pm
by shepherd
"It’s become more of a corporate scene. "

Can someone explain this one?

Are Macquarie Bank behind the scene in Melbourne. Are Melbourne clubs on the ASX?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:04 pm
by deviant
shepherd wrote:How is what I am saying 'crass' ... i used the word 'dickride' and that is pretty much the only lowbrow comment I've made.
Man, I was trying to be diplomatic. what you are saying is not crass it is valid, using "dickride" in referance to everyone who valued May's opinion is crass. I personally dont care either way, I was just being empathetic to Lucas.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:05 pm
by marcus
shepherd wrote:"It’s become more of a corporate scene. "

Can someone explain this one?

Are Macquarie Bank behind the scene in Melbourne. Are Melbourne clubs on the ASX?
We're just going through the due diligence process ourselves for Stylus. Do you want a prospectus?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:05 pm
by betson
nic wrote:'small' parties like stylus are great and dont detract from any scene, most of teh people there are regulars anyway or associated with those who go. Stylus for one is always diverse and has a great atmosphere. Prob why its pretty much always good.

Where else would I get to hear peeps like SWM and Lephrenian get to play out at?
agree

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:06 pm
by nic
however dickride is a great word, and has been used to great effect here.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:06 pm
by valuetime
shepherd wrote:"It’s become more of a corporate scene. "

Can someone explain this one?
i think his opinion is that promoters are increasingly looking after their bottom line at the expense of the punters or party.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:07 pm
by nic
Do you want a prospectus?
ahh no i want a genital prosthesis the one i left in teh bathroom at stylus was fine can i ahve it back?

lol scene politix (like that crap shop)

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:09 pm
by marcus
shepherd wrote:"It’s become more of a corporate scene. "
This also coming from someone who is probably charging thousands of dollars for each of his performances.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:11 pm
by marcus
nic wrote:
Do you want a prospectus?
ahh no i want a genital prosthesis the one i left in teh bathroom at stylus was fine can i ahve it back?

lol scene politix (like that crap shop)
No it's in use. I'll be finished with it by Monday.

:lol:

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:12 pm
by deviant
nic wrote:Where are the breaks parties on the same scale and level of interest as calyx, pendulum etc ?
I think people are just scared to go that big... I know I would be pretty hesitant to front the sort of $$$ that would require at this stage. Don't get me wrong, that is our ultimate goal at RLT but it's a while off yet.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:13 pm
by nic
ed209 for 3 people is worth it

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:19 pm
by deviant
ummmm sure, you got the $$$$ ?? :P

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:21 pm
by shepherd
valuetime wrote:
shepherd wrote:"It’s become more of a corporate scene. "

Can someone explain this one?
i think his opinion is that promoters are increasingly looking after their bottom line at the expense of the punters or party.
and this is a new phenomenon? if you want a scene to be sustainable surely it has to be financially viable.

also - coming from someone who charges prob 10k plus for a DJ gig this is really rich.

also, coming from someone who licences tunes to corporations it's so rich i think i'm choking on my own self satisfaction.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:28 pm
by sneaky hands
shepherd wrote: i think i'm choking on my own self satisfaction.
rofl
man some day when i figure out who the fuck you are im gonna buy you a beer.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:32 pm
by breaksRbest
nic wrote:Where are the breaks parties on the same scale and level of interest as calyx, pendulum etc ?

The ones everyone loves that are rammed.

I cant remember the last 'big' breaks party I went to like that.
*cough* 33 & 1/3 *cough*

Just coz they let dnb acts play doesn't make it any less a Breaks party.

Speaking of which, when was the last time a major DNB night had a Breaks room? I can't think of a single one.

Miss Bee wrote:Half the problem (IMO) is there is far to many little nights competing over the same small pool of people that have always gone out, rather than people working together to put on something mid sized and decent and attract a new crowd.

Kenny Larkin last week was a prime example of a party that was excellently promoted, support line up was excellent (with a variety of DJs from different genres and different social circles) and playpen was RAMMED with punters.

I kind of see your point about lots of little parties, but then to use the Kenny Larkin party as an example of the opposite is waaay wrong IMO. There was no working together with other crews, it was a Soma Corp party and held in a venue with a capacity of 300. I'd call that small.

[/i]

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:36 pm
by sneaky hands
breaksRbest wrote: Speaking of which, when was the last time a major DNB night had a Breaks room? I can't think of a single one.
not trying to start a debate about which is intrinsically better, but it seems that generally, while breaks fans can tolerate dnb, dnb heads cant stand breaks.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:37 pm
by Lizkins
sneaky hands wrote:
breaksRbest wrote: Speaking of which, when was the last time a major DNB night had a Breaks room? I can't think of a single one.
not trying to start a debate about which is intrinsically better, but it seems that generally, while breaks fans can tolerate dnb, dnb heads cant stand breaks.

:scr1pt: