Um mixi you a little way iffThe Mixtress wrote:Halle-fucking-ujah. I have the same dislike for Karl. Used to love him until I started listening to him on the radio everyday and found so many faults in his answers that I lost all respect for him. Sad daymrj wrote:Dr Karl (not Lynt) is an idiot.
For some reason he seems to believe that if you say something quickly, loudly, and with enough authority that this makes it true.
This is not the case, it only makes it quick and loud. Sort of like sex with an adolescent Panda. Perhaps more painful though.
Did you know that if you left the earth in a spaceship and travelled for 10 earth years at the speed of light toward an object, then returned, you would be younger then when you left or at least wouldn't have aged at all?! This is where the time space continuum kicks my ass. On earth, you would be aging in earth time, but hurtling through space at the speed of light means you age at a slower rate b/c time is stopping for you.
As an object accelerates, time slows down relative to that object. It would seem to the traveller that time would have stopped, because nothing is travelling faster than him.
Even though it's been proven impossible, if you could travel faster than the speed of light, you'd be able to take off and turn around to watch yourself taking off.
Head fuck or what! FMF where are you??
Time would pass at the normal rate for you (ie you would age normally) its just that time would be passing faster on earth.
So if you travel away from the earth at the speed of light (assuming constant velocity, which we know not to be true but will serve for this argument) for 5 years, and then back for 5, when you returned
- You would be 10 years older
- Everyone you knew on Earth would be 100 years older, which means that they would be dead, or at the very least like watching matlock and be scared of teenagers.