Camera

For all your off topic conversation requirements. No posts about gigs please, use the Music forum. As usual, no "NSFW" material, keep it clean.
User avatar
huge
old boy
Posts: 7368
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: the rings around saturn
Contact:

Post by huge »

BammBamm wrote:Save yourself a hundred or two and buy it off these guys CIA. I've gone with them a few times and they have been reliable and only taken 3-4days to my door step 8)

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Canon-IXUS-900-T ... dZViewItem
$77 postage!
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
User avatar
db
Posts: 874
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 3:02 pm
Location: Just left the house in my blue allstars
Contact:

Post by db »

deviant wrote:Sandisk 4GB Extreme III FTW.... $50
Yeah? :shock:

Where? :wink:
Pimpin' since pimpin' was pimpin'

DOPEBEAT'S MYSPACE
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

db wrote:
deviant wrote:Sandisk 4GB Extreme III FTW.... $50
Yeah? :shock:

Where? :wink:
sorry I lied, US$49.99 from ebay..... probably fakes :?
User avatar
breaksRbest
Posts: 9966
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E

Post by breaksRbest »

the choice of lenses is a bit overwhelming

SO many options
I think I am, Therefore I am. I think
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

breaksRbest wrote:the choice of lenses is a bit overwhelming

SO many options
yeah fully..... does my head in.....

I'm sticking with the kit 18-55 for the time being and gunna go for a super-wide first before replacing the kit with a better lens......

definitely go for a EF 50mm F1.8 to begin with ..... only $100 and totally awesome.
User avatar
breaksRbest
Posts: 9966
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E

Post by breaksRbest »

deviant wrote:definitely go for a EF 50mm F1.8 to begin with ..... only $100 and totally awesome.
got one already ;)
I think I am, Therefore I am. I think
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

nice nice
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... 0194730208

:shock:

Image

new this would cost ~
5D body: $2500
16-35 mkII: $1800
70-200: $1400
580ex flash: $650

$6350!!!

blimey, I wish I had the cash, this could be bargain of the year!
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

new toy....

Image

Olympus OM-1 with 50mm f1.8 & 28mm f3.5 + mecablitz 30BCT4 bounce flash

:D

pics to come soon
User avatar
J Gal
Posts: 1703
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:59 pm

Post by J Gal »

need tips from holga lovers... Just got given cfn holga from spherix, dopest camera but need some more tips! so much fun for a toy camera, gal now has 7 cameras in tow...
These are the days of our lolz
User avatar
Mellogs
Posts: 9046
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:12 pm
Location: rehab BloodType:A-

Post by Mellogs »

To the hardcore shutterbugs:

Canon EOS 400D Digital vs Nikon D40x?

your thoughts please.
...and basically that's the situation
User avatar
breaksRbest
Posts: 9966
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: 37°49'S 144°58' E

Post by breaksRbest »

EOS 400D or STFU
I think I am, Therefore I am. I think
User avatar
nhd
Posts: 1602
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:26 am
Contact:

Post by nhd »

400D over a D40 for sure Mell, just better specs allround with better upgrade options.
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Post by fooishbar »

canon.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
User avatar
Mellogs
Posts: 9046
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:12 pm
Location: rehab BloodType:A-

Post by Mellogs »

needs more info
...and basically that's the situation
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Post by fooishbar »

better lens and accessory availability is the clincher. also i prefer the camera itself, but yeah.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
User avatar
system
let the hustlers play
Posts: 10126
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 3:27 pm
Location: the leave garden

Post by system »

Mellogs wrote:Canon EOS 400D Digital vs Nikon D40x?
it'd be more accurate to compare the d80 to the 300d, but the canon back has better auto focus, higher image capture resolution and a better (imo) ccd.

you can read more about the d40 and the 400d on digital photography review though. make up your own mind. :)
DRS wrote:It’s uplifting while we drift through time,
‘cause we keep pushing the vibe.
User avatar
FunkyJ
Posts: 483
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:18 pm
Location: Now of Melbourne
Contact:

Post by FunkyJ »

I'm in the market for a new camera.

Mine's fine for what I want to do now, but I may want to become a stalker in the future and I can't change the lens so it's not future-proof.

Plus it's also only 5.1 megapix so it's not fantastic quality...
Ready to drop, Audio rock, here comes the boy from the South!
-= www.funkyj.com =-
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

canon

spend the extra and get a 40D

they are mad
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Post by fooishbar »

40d = success.
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
User avatar
huge
old boy
Posts: 7368
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: the rings around saturn
Contact:

Post by huge »

join them. jooin themmm......

lol
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
User avatar
yenks
Posts: 1339
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 11:10 pm

Post by yenks »

Just got my Canon EOS 400D Kiss Digital X Rebel XTi + EF-S 17-85mm

:smt049


Image
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Post by JAMESSSS »

All about pinhole these days.
Don't hate me for house
User avatar
Stray
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:21 pm
Location: in and out and round about

Post by Stray »

nikon d40x is made of win.
User avatar
huge
old boy
Posts: 7368
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: the rings around saturn
Contact:

Post by huge »

ive got the new 900D Fiber N GTR Turbo.

the N stands for naughty.

it comes with 4 lenses that you can put on all at the same time.
...
Last edited by huge on Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Post by fooishbar »

huge wrote:join them. jooin themmm......

be individual, get a holga
:teef:
User avatar
huge
old boy
Posts: 7368
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: the rings around saturn
Contact:

Post by huge »

:P i dont use that anymore huhuh.

i should pull it out i got a 35mm adapter for it huhu.

i lost (got flogged??) my digicam anyway. so im left with that and the pentax thing. fucked.
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

huhuhuhuge

fail
User avatar
Mellogs
Posts: 9046
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:12 pm
Location: rehab BloodType:A-

Post by Mellogs »

Stray wrote:nikon d40x is made of win.
indeed. very tempting.
...and basically that's the situation
User avatar
mixtress
Posts: 13386
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:15 am

Post by mixtress »

RIP

Image

Polaroid have announced they're not manufacturing these badboys anymore.

Sad :(
Only the meek get pinched...the bold survive
User avatar
Fents
Posts: 9551
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:32 am
Location: In the Brewery.
Contact:

Post by Fents »

Camera People pls recomend me a digi camera - somthing cheapish, no slr etc.

Cheers
User avatar
Fents
Posts: 9551
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:32 am
Location: In the Brewery.
Contact:

Post by Fents »

yea lazy.

dont camera;s get outdated as quick as PC's tho?

if not then its the pentax optio i guess...
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Post by JAMESSSS »

So who is going to start the MB.com Canon 400D facebook fan club?
Don't hate me for house
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Post by fooishbar »

jbs wrote:So who is going to start the MB.com Canon 400D facebook fan club?
<3
User avatar
witty_pseudonym
Posts: 11779
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:53 am
Location: betwixt and between

Post by witty_pseudonym »

400D on sale a JB for $999 or sommat.

not baaaaaad.
...
User avatar
J Gal
Posts: 1703
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:59 pm

Post by J Gal »

I've scoured the web looking for 110mm film. Does anybody know how i could get my hands on some? Been searching for hours but no luck :(
These are the days of our lolz
User avatar
Jinx
Posts: 943
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 12:03 am

Post by Jinx »

J is it for your holga? If it is then just buy 120 film on ebay, usually takes a week to arrive. Otherwise Vanbar, but its pretty exy.
User avatar
J Gal
Posts: 1703
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:59 pm

Post by J Gal »

Image

This is the film i'm looking for bammbamm. I know what the 120 is. I'm using old skool spy cameras now.
These are the days of our lolz
User avatar
J Gal
Posts: 1703
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:59 pm

Post by J Gal »

BammBamm wrote:J is it for your holga? If it is then just buy 120 film on ebay, usually takes a week to arrive. Otherwise Vanbar, but its pretty exy.
Oh and vanbar isn't too bad. Lachie is up with the specials! I find that the expired stuff is super duper cheap and fun to use Got a membership card that gives discount. I love that store. Its like porn to me!
These are the days of our lolz
User avatar
ghetto kitty
Posts: 13157
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 1:40 pm
Contact:

Post by ghetto kitty »

fooishbar wrote:
jbs wrote:So who is going to start the MB.com Canon 400D facebook fan club?
<3
if only i had time to read the manual tho.
still have no idea what im doin and have owned it months and months.

will take with me when i go OS in april and hopefully come back knowing how it works

:?
User avatar
fooishbar
Posts: 8660
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 am
Location: there and/or elsewhere

Post by fooishbar »

ghetto kitty wrote:
fooishbar wrote:
jbs wrote:So who is going to start the MB.com Canon 400D facebook fan club?
<3
if only i had time to read the manual tho.
still have no idea what im doin and have owned it months and months.

will take with me when i go OS in april and hopefully come back knowing how it works

:?
you really just need to know how apeture, shutter speed, and sensitivity relate to each other and to the shot. once you've got that, it's all gravy.
User avatar
huge
old boy
Posts: 7368
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: the rings around saturn
Contact:

Post by huge »

J Gal wrote:Image

This is the film i'm looking for bammbamm. I know what the 120 is. I'm using old skool spy cameras now.
oh man! my dad used to have this awesome 80's as white flat camera that took that film. fucken 80's as. huhuh. rad.
User avatar
J Gal
Posts: 1703
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:59 pm

Post by J Gal »

huge wrote:
J Gal wrote:Image

This is the film i'm looking for bammbamm. I know what the 120 is. I'm using old skool spy cameras now.
oh man! my dad used to have this awesome 80's as white flat camera that took that film. fucken 80's as. huhuh. rad.
so hot aye?! just can't find it anywhere :(
These are the days of our lolz
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Post by JAMESSSS »

http://6mpixel.org/en/
A digital camera with 12 million pixels is better than one with 6 million. ‘That is correct’ is what you would probably say because you’ve always heard more pixels are better.

It’s not true(!!!),
Don't hate me for house
User avatar
nic
Posts: 11184
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:12 pm
Contact:

Post by nic »

anyone seen that Bathing Ape Futura Air Max collab 400D on ebay?

takes a sik macroshot of a toy, thats for sure
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Post by JAMESSSS »

nic wrote:anyone seen that Bathing Ape Futura Air Max collab 400D on ebay?

takes a sik macroshot of a toy, thats for sure
Hang on .. I thought you were dead?
Don't hate me for house
User avatar
ghetto kitty
Posts: 13157
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 1:40 pm
Contact:

Post by ghetto kitty »

fooishbar wrote:
ghetto kitty wrote:
fooishbar wrote: <3
if only i had time to read the manual tho.
still have no idea what im doin and have owned it months and months.

will take with me when i go OS in april and hopefully come back knowing how it works

:?
you really just need to know how apeture, shutter speed, and sensitivity relate to each other and to the shot. once you've got that, it's all gravy.
yep foo, but the last time i knew any of that shit was in high school.
needs refresher course.
the only one in the CBD is on wed when i have late mngmnt meetings so FAIL to that.
User avatar
deviant
Posts: 18213
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: couch
Contact:

Post by deviant »

jbs wrote:http://6mpixel.org/en/
A digital camera with 12 million pixels is better than one with 6 million. ‘That is correct’ is what you would probably say because you’ve always heard more pixels are better.

It’s not true(!!!),
makes sense, although it also says that a full frame (35mm) sensor is best and capable of 96MP :shock:

I guess it's mainly talking about conpacts

this thread has comments that echo this, the industry is obsessed with MP count. I know that people always ask when they see my Dslr "how many megapixels is that?" which is kind of irrelevant..... my old canon ixus 3.2pm takes fantastic shots too :?
Last edited by deviant on Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
JAMESSSS
Posts: 9844
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:09 am

Post by JAMESSSS »

deviant wrote: makes sense, although it also says that a full frame (35mm) sensor is best and capable of 96MP :shock:
It is in theory if you work out the size of the frame divided by whatever the pixel size they use I think.

Yeah compacts.
Don't hate me for house
Post Reply