the official console and PC nerdy thread!
- saintberry
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:17 pm
Hahaha thats gold. I totally forgot it was even happening.
Re the AI in Gears, yeah it is way impressive. I feel its more advanced in Rainbow Six Vegas tho. Those terrorists are sneaky! Could just be a perception though.
Have you finished it on insane yet?
And for those with crackdown has anyone got the free runner achievement? I've got 3 orbs left and can't find them anywhere :'(
Re the AI in Gears, yeah it is way impressive. I feel its more advanced in Rainbow Six Vegas tho. Those terrorists are sneaky! Could just be a perception though.
Have you finished it on insane yet?
And for those with crackdown has anyone got the free runner achievement? I've got 3 orbs left and can't find them anywhere :'(
First you get her name. Then you get her number. Then you get some get some in the back seat of a hummer!
Nah, I haven't finished insane yet.. am up to the bit with the theron guards.saintberry wrote:Hahaha thats gold. I totally forgot it was even happening.
Re the AI in Gears, yeah it is way impressive. I feel its more advanced in Rainbow Six Vegas tho. Those terrorists are sneaky! Could just be a perception though.
Have you finished it on insane yet?
And for those with crackdown has anyone got the free runner achievement? I've got 3 orbs left and can't find them anywhere :'(
http://www.ukresistance.co.uk
that entire site is lolz. plus they fanboy the dc and sonic team and all things sega, so more power to them. so yeah, read the front page and laugh your arse off at ps3, then read the archives and just laugh your arse off.
<3 uk:r
- Dark Lord Piddle Bottom
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:34 pm
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
i'll get one in a few years maybe.
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
- saintberry
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:17 pm
Like M$ does... no, but they still have a fuck load of money. Trouble with Sony is their brand is cut up into hundreds of smaller offshoots. Like Sony Pictures, Sony BMG etc etc, so each (including Sony Computer Entertainment) gets a smaller piece of the pie.mecka wrote:realistically speaking does Sony have the monetary resources to keep making a loss on each unit like Microsoft does?
Its less evident with M$. M$ Game Studios is much more integrated into the entire company.
The PS3 will do well in the long run, I don't think there is much question about that.
Its interesting the looking at parallels between PS2 vs Xbox and Xbox 360 vs PS3. Launching first seems to have a big advantage.
First you get her name. Then you get her number. Then you get some get some in the back seat of a hummer!
- saintberry
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:17 pm
- saintberry
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:17 pm
Yeah I read about that a few days ago ^ interesting stuff.
Fuck though, 200w for a PS3 under load (I'm assuming thats JUST the CPU). Thats disgusting. It should be fucking banned if thats a true representation of its power consumption. The xbox360 draws about 160w under load (for all components though) and that too is way poor form.
In this day and age companies really need to start addressing the efficiency of their products, I personally would pay more for this shit if it was easier on the environment.
A lot more work need to go into PCs tapping into the number crunching potential of GPUs. Those things are beasts when it comes to floating point calculations, apparently carnts to program for though.
Fuck though, 200w for a PS3 under load (I'm assuming thats JUST the CPU). Thats disgusting. It should be fucking banned if thats a true representation of its power consumption. The xbox360 draws about 160w under load (for all components though) and that too is way poor form.
In this day and age companies really need to start addressing the efficiency of their products, I personally would pay more for this shit if it was easier on the environment.
A lot more work need to go into PCs tapping into the number crunching potential of GPUs. Those things are beasts when it comes to floating point calculations, apparently carnts to program for though.
First you get her name. Then you get her number. Then you get some get some in the back seat of a hummer!
IBM said its prototypes can transmit 160 gigabits of data per second -- reducing the download time for a feature-length high-definition video from 30 minutes to one second.
The only thing about this high speed transfer technology, is who's harddrive can write 160GB per second?
Am I wrong?
The only thing about this high speed transfer technology, is who's harddrive can write 160GB per second?
Am I wrong?
- saintberry
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:17 pm
I doubt this would ever be in the hands of the end user. More for network backbones and the like.
Cisco have are router that can theoretically transfer 100tbps on silicon based tech. When all your doing is routing billions of packets down hella pipes you can achieve shit like that.
Cisco have are router that can theoretically transfer 100tbps on silicon based tech. When all your doing is routing billions of packets down hella pipes you can achieve shit like that.
First you get her name. Then you get her number. Then you get some get some in the back seat of a hummer!
- system
- let the hustlers play
- Posts: 10126
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 3:27 pm
- Location: the leave garden
no-ones, using current technology. the likely errors would require a new approach to file handling at a core level alone.lynt wrote:IBM said its prototypes can transmit 160 gigabits of data per second -- reducing the download time for a feature-length high-definition video from 30 minutes to one second.
The only thing about this high speed transfer technology, is who's harddrive can write 160GB per second?
no. storage has gotta get to solid state and become far, far cheaper too.lynt wrote:Am I wrong?
spot on. would hate for a router running at that speed to start losing packets, though. :\saintberry wrote:I doubt this would ever be in the hands of the end user. More for network backbones and the like.
whaddaya mean, everything is based around 1970's style operating systems now!lynt wrote:I hear ya. But think forward. We weren't supposed to have computers this mad when considered in the 1970's. Now look!
DRS wrote:It’s uplifting while we drift through time,
‘cause we keep pushing the vibe.
meh, general-purpose cpu's aren't going away, ever. looking inside the n800, the hardware which i'm most intimately familiar with:
* one arm cpu
* one dsp
* one arm-based wireless chip (i.e. general-purpose cpu, programmed with firmware)
* specialised chips for usb, bluetooth, lcd scanout, fm radio
that's a pretty decent general:specialised ratio.
looking inside my desktop, we have two extremely powerful general-purpose processors in the athlon64 and the radeon r580. the r580 happens to be a shitload better at vector ops than the athlon64, but it's still a frighteningly capable general-purpose processor.
now, the cell's approach to parallelism is interesting, something sun did with niagra as well. unfortunately niagra was more or less a disaster because people who buy solaris still want to run oracle. but it's a pretty cool idea, nonetheless.
but i really don't think general-purpose is dying: cell is a general-purpose processor which happens to be extremely good at folding. before that, gpgpu was kicking arse on folding, iirc. the cell also isn't that specialised ... it's just another type of cpu, albeit one with a very interesting design (but so was the itanium).
as they note in that entry, it's so complex because it's so arbitrarily programmable. indeed, it is to dsps and fpus what ben cousins is to normal football players.
put another way: if it wasn't general-purpose, we'd still have the same fixed-function pipelines we had with the r2xx and early nv cards. the exponential explosion in transistor count has come with the same explosion in programmability and complexity in shaders, both vertex and fragment.
edit: a lot of words, even after i decided to just stop writing at one point because i was waffling, and i still didn't even manage to say: they are general-purpose cpus, they're just fucking good at vector ops and number-crunching in general. a modern-day itanium, right down to the power consumption.
* one arm cpu
* one dsp
* one arm-based wireless chip (i.e. general-purpose cpu, programmed with firmware)
* specialised chips for usb, bluetooth, lcd scanout, fm radio
that's a pretty decent general:specialised ratio.
looking inside my desktop, we have two extremely powerful general-purpose processors in the athlon64 and the radeon r580. the r580 happens to be a shitload better at vector ops than the athlon64, but it's still a frighteningly capable general-purpose processor.
now, the cell's approach to parallelism is interesting, something sun did with niagra as well. unfortunately niagra was more or less a disaster because people who buy solaris still want to run oracle. but it's a pretty cool idea, nonetheless.
but i really don't think general-purpose is dying: cell is a general-purpose processor which happens to be extremely good at folding. before that, gpgpu was kicking arse on folding, iirc. the cell also isn't that specialised ... it's just another type of cpu, albeit one with a very interesting design (but so was the itanium).
as they note in that entry, it's so complex because it's so arbitrarily programmable. indeed, it is to dsps and fpus what ben cousins is to normal football players.
put another way: if it wasn't general-purpose, we'd still have the same fixed-function pipelines we had with the r2xx and early nv cards. the exponential explosion in transistor count has come with the same explosion in programmability and complexity in shaders, both vertex and fragment.
edit: a lot of words, even after i decided to just stop writing at one point because i was waffling, and i still didn't even manage to say: they are general-purpose cpus, they're just fucking good at vector ops and number-crunching in general. a modern-day itanium, right down to the power consumption.
Last edited by fooishbar on Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
xnu loves no-one at all. seriously, read that.system wrote:XNU loves everyone.fooishbar wrote:walnut/the hurd/plan 9 will save us all!system wrote:whaddaya mean, everything is based around 1970's style operating systems now!
this is what handles your every key press.
- system
- let the hustlers play
- Posts: 10126
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 3:27 pm
- Location: the leave garden
fooishbar wrote:xnu loves no-one at all. seriously, read that.system wrote:XNU loves everyone.fooishbar wrote: walnut/the hurd/plan 9 will save us all!
this is what handles your every key press.
there was an inherent level of sarcasm in my post.
(I've got far too much familiarity with the I/O headers of Darwin. )
DRS wrote:It’s uplifting while we drift through time,
‘cause we keep pushing the vibe.
i'm so sorry.
(says the x input maintainer. uuuggghhh. thanks sgi.)
(says the x input maintainer. uuuggghhh. thanks sgi.)
myspace / too much! / photos (flickr) / photos (tumblr)
aroes wrote:promising, but lost me at offensive mid range snarl
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
you guys....
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
yes. :lookaround:
i should have command and conquer 3 tomorra hopefully. although i get about 10 minutes a week to play games these days boo.
i should have command and conquer 3 tomorra hopefully. although i get about 10 minutes a week to play games these days boo.
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
- saintberry
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:17 pm
Agreed. It has been confirmed by M$ they are getting the 65nm chip and HDMI though.Stray wrote:As far as I've heard that's just a rumour..mecka wrote:black xbox 360s with HDMI output and 120gb hdds are coming
HDMI is crap anyway. DVI-D + Toslink || S/PDIF any day.
First you get her name. Then you get her number. Then you get some get some in the back seat of a hummer!
- Dark Lord Piddle Bottom
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:34 pm
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
no! but the point is i will HAVE IT!mecka wrote:can ur puter even run cnc 3?huge wrote:yes. :lookaround:
i should have command and conquer 3 tomorra hopefully. although i get about 10 minutes a week to play games these days boo.
gotta go get stalker & cnc 3 tomorrow methinks. big spending week coming up.
hheheheheheehhe.
(man i need to upgrade) actually i just need a new gfx card.
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
- huge
- old boy
- Posts: 7368
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: the rings around saturn
- Contact:
paper mario looks so freaking cool
http://www.thelittlemule.com - tredleys and caffeine
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums
http://www.dubstep.com.au - aussie dubstep forums